Climate risk needs fair response: report
THE burden of sealevel rise will weigh on the most vulnerable unless a new approach is developed and legislated, a new report says.
The paper, written by University of Otago Associate Prof Lisa Ellis, is part of research from the Deep South National Science Challenge. It looks at how New Zealand distributes the risks of sealevel rise.
It proposes an ‘‘ethically robust’’ policy to adapt to the risks of climate change.
Tens of thousands of buildings, infrastructure including airports, railways, and roads, and more than 100,000 residents are at risk of serious loss and damage associated with sealevel rise within the next century.
Prof Ellis said sealevel rise was entirely predictable, but if New Zealand was proactive about adaptation to climate change, people’s wellbeing would not be threatened.
But she said it was possible existing inequality would be exacerbated and the cost of adapting to climate change would rise if the status quo remained.
Her report recommended a government resource about adapting to sealevel rise nationwide, so community resilience did not vary with ratepayers’ ability to pay.
At local level the public should be engaged as early and deeply as possible.
Last year, the Ministry for the Environment released guidelines on adaptation for local government.
Prof Ellis said while they were a step in the right direction, they were just guidelines.
Her report recommended that government ensured crossregional equality, so communities did not feel unduly punished by proactive councils.
An example of this was if communities chose to build sea walls for protection, there was a risk that beaches ended up getting lost to the engineered protection works.
The report laid out the need to prefund adaptation measures on a national level because it would overcome intergenerational inequality in the future.
‘‘It’s going to be very difficult for them to have any kind of wellbeing comparable to ours if we don’t prefund adaptation,’’ Prof Ellis said.
It would also overcome inequality among exposed regions, because the ability to respond to sealevel rise depen ded on ratepayer capacity, which varied across New Zealand.
Prof Ellis said it was vital young people were engaged early, as they had the greatest stake in the future.
‘‘It would be a monstrous violation of our duty to them, to exclude them from these decisions, when in fact the decisions will meet them much more than it will meet us.’’
She said often community consultation meetings were held during the day and tended to amplify the voices of people who were old and disproportionately wealthy, and young, disadvantaged people needed representation. — RNZ