Otago Daily Times

Do research when investing in art, experts warn

-

AUCKLAND: People thinking of investing in assets such as art and jewellery which would be exempt under a recommende­d capital gains tax should do their homework and avoid rushing into it, a leading auctioneer says.

Last week, the Tax Working Group recommende­d a widerangin­g capital gains tax (CGT) be imposed on investment properties, businesses assets and farms.

Jewellery and art — as well as cars, boats and the family home — would all be exempt.

Auctioneer Dunbar Sloane said it was hard to know what impact the proposed CGT would have on art and jewellery.

‘‘Whether you have people diverting funds into jewellery, I guess you’ll have a bit of that going on,’’ he said.

‘‘I think with things like art, it’s such a specialise­d collecting area. Whether people will be brave enough to divert funds into art remains to be seen.’’

The Tax Working Group’s report classified art and jewellery as ‘‘personal use assets’’.

It accepted that these types of assets were often bought as investment­s expected to increase in value.

In fact, the report said that excluding these assets from a CGT may incentivis­e people to buy them over other more productive assets.

‘‘However, at this time, the group proposes to exclude these assets for reasons of simplicity and compliance cost reduction.

Mr Sloane said some artists had returned well, but art went in and out of vogue, which affected value.

‘‘You can’t say, ‘buying art you’ll double your money’. There’s no magic formula, you’ve got to do your homework. You’ve got to pick the upandcomer­s.’’

He said it was not always the case that the art someone bought would go up in value, and said the market needed to be observed for a few years.

Webb’s director Ewen MackenzieB­owie said decorative arts, jewellery and wine could all serve as investment­s, but as with most alternativ­es, there was risk.

Although there would always be bargains that bring rapid returns, he said people need to recognise what they are buying, and be confident that it was, in fact, a bargain.

He gave the example of a painting, Salvator Mundi, attributed to Leonardo Da Vinci last year, which was sold by Christie’s for $US450 million ($NZ660 million).

It was now alleged to be a ‘‘workshop Leonardo’’, painted by an assistant, which would make it worth a fraction of the hammer price.

‘‘The buyer, the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, can probably afford to take a loss, but the lesson is salutary,’’ Mr MackenzieB­owie said. — NZME

 ?? PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES ?? Capital investment . . . Visitors view a 1641 painting by Sir Anthony Van Dyck, worth more than £5 million ($NZ9.7 million), during a media preview at Christie’s last year.
PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES Capital investment . . . Visitors view a 1641 painting by Sir Anthony Van Dyck, worth more than £5 million ($NZ9.7 million), during a media preview at Christie’s last year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand