Otago Daily Times

Skills Active ITO says training shakeup Treaty breach

- SIMON COLLINS

WELLINGTON: An industry training body is threatenin­g to go to the High Court and the Waitangi Tribunal to delay a radical shakeup of the country’s training system.

Skills Active, which runs training for recreation and performing arts, has told Education Minister Chris Hipkins it will seek a judicial review of his actions in the High Court unless he extends the consultati­on deadline for the shakeup until June 30.

One of its directors, Des Ratima, is also preparing two claims to the Waitangi Tribunal alleging the shakeup and the short period allowed for consultati­on breach the Treaty of Waitangi.

Skills Active has a bicultural structure, with half of its shares held by industry groups such as the YMCA and Education Outdoors NZ and the other half held by Maori bodies such as the NZ Maori Rugby Board and the Hauraki Maori Trust Board.

The industry shakeup, unveiled by Mr Hipkins on Feb ruary 13, would abolish Skills Active and 10 other industry training organisati­ons (ITOs).

Instead, new industry skills bodies would be created to set the standards for vocational qualificat­ions, and actual management of industry training would be transferre­d to a proposed NZ Institute of Skills and Technology, which would also take over all existing polytechni­cs.

A rationalis­ation of polytechni­cs was widely expected because many of the 16 existing institutes are losing money, but the proposal for the new national institute to take over industry training was not flagged in a consultati­on process last year and came as a surprise.

Mr Hipkins initially allowed only a sixweek consultati­on period, until March 27, but extended that on Wednesday by one week, to April 5, because of the Christchur­ch mosque attacks.

Skills Active chief executive Grant Davidson wrote to Mr Hipkins yesterday saying that, unless the consultati­on deadline was extended to June 30, Skills Active ‘‘will reluctantl­y have no option but to consider filing judicial review proceeding­s’’.

The letter included a draft 18page applicatio­n for a judicial review, prepared by lawyers Kensington Swan, claiming the short consultati­on period was a breach of Skills Active’s ‘‘legitimate expectatio­n’’ to be consulted properly, a breach of ‘‘natural justice’’, and failed to ‘‘have regard to relevant considerat­ions’’.

Mr Ratima, who chairs the Takitimu District Maori Council in Hawke’s Bay, said he was also instructin­g a lawyer to file Waitangi Tribunal claims by both the Takitimu council and the Maori shareholdi­ng bodies in Skills Active.

Maori make up 21% of all vocational education learners according to the Kensington Swan document.

Mr Ratima said the sixweek consultati­on period was ‘‘an insult’’ to Maori under the treaty framework.

He said the Maori shareholde­rs in Skills Active would also claim the proposed shakeup would breach the treaty by taking intellectu­al property developed by the Maori entities.

‘‘All the intellectu­al knowledge we have used to develop the skills and qualificat­ions that the Government will take as it folds all the ITOs up – we are putting them on notice that you can’t take the intellectu­al property,’’ he said.

Mr Hipkins’s office confirmed that it had received a letter from Skills Active but said: ‘‘We have nothing further to add at this point.’’ — NZME

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand