Otago Daily Times

Grief after Ladies Mile SHAs rejected

- GUY WILLIAMS

THE backers of two special housing areas (SHAs) proposed for Queenstown’s Ladies Mile say they are devastated they have been rejected.

Queenstown Lakes district councillor­s voted to decline the GlenpanelF­lint’s Park and Laurel Hills proposals at Thursday’s council meeting.

They were unanimous in turning down the contentiou­s 156home Laurel Hills SHA, while the vote on the two (423 units combined) proposed for the northern side of the arterial road was split — four in favour, six against.

The 600home Coneburn developmen­t near Hanley’s Farm was approved unanimousl­y.

Flint’s Park backer Lindsey Topp said the council had missed a good opportunit­y to provide muchneeded affordable housing, and was not taking advantage of the Government’s $24 million Housing Infrastruc­ture Fund (HIF) to build new infrastruc­ture along the Ladies Mile.

The interestfr­ee loan facility offered a ‘‘fair chunk of change’’ that could resolve the traffic congestion issues councillor­s were most concerned about.

‘‘That work could be done before any new houses came on board.’’

He and fellow backer Mark Tylden had yet to discuss whether the formation of an urban developmen­t authority, expected to be set up by the Government, could encourage them to put their proposal forward again at a later date.

‘‘It’s just that when you spend so much time heading down the track — you’re encouraged to do so and you do everything that’s asked of you — and you end up with an outcome like this.

‘‘We’ll have to think about that.’’

Kristan Stalker, a director of the family company behind the Flint’s Park proposal, said he was ‘‘perplexed’’ by the decision.

The council had made a significan­t investment in developing a Ladies Mile master plan, it had access to HIF loans to upgrade infrastruc­ture and the Ministry of Education was interested in building a new primary school beside the proposed new housing.

Mr Stalker said he and his fellow directors had not decided on the next step, but would see what came of the Government’s urban developmen­t authority.

One of Laurel Hills’ backers, Fraser Mackenzie of David Reid Homes, said he was not surprised by the decision given councillor­s deferred the issue at last month’s meeting.

He and his fellow backers were prepared to ‘‘wait and see’’ what happened.

‘‘We’re not too worried about it. It’s a good location, and someday something might happen.’’

Housing and Urban Developmen­t Minister Phil Twyford told the Otago Daily Times last month SHAs did not make housing more affordable, and the legislatio­n would not be extended beyond its September 16 expiry date.

Instead, the Government was setting up a housing and urban developmen­t authority to help speed up urban developmen­t projects.

Lake Hayes Estate and Shotover Country Community Associatio­n chairman Clark Pirie said councillor­s had been in a difficult spot with SHA legislatio­n soon to expire, but had made the right decision.

Pressure on roading and educationa­l facilities were causing residents ‘‘a lot of pain’’, and more houses would worsen the situation.

‘‘I think it’s right for them to take a step back and retain a significan­tly greater measure of control over developmen­t of the Ladies Mile.’’

Mayor Jim Boult told the developers at the meeting their proposals were ‘‘fair and reasonable’’, and he did not believe the council was opposed to developmen­t in the area in the future.

However, the NZ Transport Agency had ‘‘dropped the ball completely’’ in addressing the area’s traffic issues.

The council could not approve further developmen­t along the Ladies Mile until the agency produced a ‘‘concrete plan’’ addressing the crossing of the Kawarau River by motorists, cyclists and pedestrian­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand