Otago Daily Times

Not obvious why duchess reigning royal chew toy

British tabloids are thriving financiall­y by turning their monarchy into a soap opera, writes

- AnneMarie O’Connor.

BREXIT is roiling Britain. Prince Andrew has been accused by a woman of abusing her as a teenager in Jeffrey Epstein’s child sexexploit­ation network. Yet the British tabloids are obsessed by another royal: the Duchess of Sussex, the most highprofil­e woman of colour in Britain.

Why the duchess has become the reigning royal chew toy isn’t obvious. She is a selfmade profession­al who has eagerly become a royal champion of charities benefiting girls and women. She quickly accomplish­ed the traditiona­l job of female royals: providing a male heir. Among British millennial­s, she is more popular than Prince Charles, and she shares his 46% positive rating among Britons overall, according to a recent poll. And she’s married to the most popular male royal, Prince Harry.

Her ascendancy was an inspiratio­n to many black girls and women. Yet the duchess has acquired a virulent mob of media detractors, who provide a megaphone for attacks from estranged relatives, snipe at such nonoffence­s as her cradling her baby bump and single her out for the luxurious lifestyle she married into — though she hardly invented British royalty and its costly trappings.

Perhaps a Department of Meghan Studies will someday ponder why the duchess is endlessly jeered for things that win other royals applause, such as wearing oneshoulde­r gowns and jewels, and expensive parties and vacations. Or explain how, after tabloid reports that she has brought discord into the Royal Family, the British monarchy remains strangely intact.

Those wondering what Meghan and Harry have been thinking about this onslaught got their answer last week, when the duchess filed a lawsuit against the Mail on Sunday newspaper for publishing a private letter she sent to her father.

‘‘I have been a silent witness to her private suffering for too long,’’ Prince Harry wrote in a statement, decrying ‘‘relentless propaganda’’ by a ‘‘press pack that has vilified her almost daily for the past nine months’’.

‘‘I lost my mother and now I watch my wife falling victim to the same powerful forces,’’ referring to his mother, Princess Diana, who died in a car crash in Paris while being chased by paparazzi on motorcycle­s.

To some, the takedown of the duchess is all about race. ‘‘Dear England and English press, just say you hate her because she’s black, and him for marrying a black woman and be done with it,’’ tweeted British actress Jameela Jamil. ‘‘Your bullying is so embarrassi­ng and obvious. You’ve all lost your marbles.’’

The duchess’ biracial heritage has been mocked since the day the Daily Mail’s headline announced ‘‘Harry’s girl is (almost) straight outta Compton.’’ Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s sister Rachel described the prince’s thengirlfr­iend as the daughter of a ‘‘dreadlocke­d AfricanAme­rican woman’’ who would bring ‘‘rich and exotic DNA’’ to the Royal Family.

‘‘The problem is that Meghan Markle is a mixedrace woman, occupying a space which was presumed for a white woman, in a notoriousl­y white institutio­n,’’ journalist Ilayda McIntosh wrote on the online Common Sense Network.

When the royal baby, Archie, was born, BBC presenter Danny Baker tweeted a photo of a posh man and woman with a chimpanzee, captioned ‘‘royal baby leaves hospital’’. Baker was fired. A BBC summer satire show portrayed a cartoon duchess with darker skin threatenin­g to knife the Duchess of Cambridge in a caricature­d urban accent.

Meghan was even criticised for her guestediti­ng of a fall issue of

British Vogue, although her sisterinla­w had guestedite­d the

Huffington Post. ‘‘Was the criticism racist? Some of it, yeah,’’ Edward Enninful, the editor of British Vogue,

told the Guardian.

British tabloids thrive financiall­y by turning their monarchy into a soap opera.

Royal women bear the brunt of media criticism, which is sometimes crassly sexist, such as the suggestion the duchess suffers from ‘‘American wife syndrome’’.

After the Sussexes were criticised for preaching environmen­talism while flying in private jets — Harry said he was concerned for his family’s safety — a Guardian columnist joked that maybe the royal couple should just stay home, where the ‘‘[b]uzzwords for Meghan’s mood board might be: silent, stoic, dutiful’’.

Instead, Meghan and Harry flew British Airways to South Africa, where she told a cheering crowd that, ‘‘while I am here with my husband as a member of the Royal Family, I want you to know that for me, I am here as a mother, as a wife, as a woman, as a woman of colour, and as your sister’’.

The trip was a reminder that the MeghanandH­arry love story has put a modern face on British royalty and Britain’s long history of racebased colonial exploitati­on. In dismantlin­g this image, Britain has far more to lose than the Duchess of Sussex. —

A

AnneMarie O’Connor is a Londonbase­d journalist and the

author of The Lady in Gold: The Extraordin­ary Tale of Gustav Klimt’s Masterpiec­e, Portrait of Adele BlochBauer.

 ?? PHOTO: REUTERS ?? Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, and Prince Harry have put a modern face on British royalty.
PHOTO: REUTERS Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, and Prince Harry have put a modern face on British royalty.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand