Baxter Trust boss responds to criticism

THE letter headed ‘‘Baxter memorial does not stack up’’ (ODT, 22.4.20) demands an immediate response.

Stuart Griffiths is not an independent commentator on this issue. His was one of three designs shortlisted for the Baxter Peace Garden when the proposed site was the museum reserve. When that site failed to get the goahead and the Albany St site was offered by the council, the trust invited Mr Griffiths and the other two shortlisters to resubmit a design for the Albany St site. He chose not to take up that offer.

The proposal has gone through extensive review processes within the council and at two public council sessions. In none of these conversations was any opposition raised. There was universal council support for the development of the memorial.

The proposed alpine garden is in honour of Millicent Baxter, who was an expert on these flora.

The site was offered to the trust by the council after other sites had been explored and rejected. We have been assured by the council’s own engineers and by those commissioned by the trust that the structural plans for the site are sound and will not be subject to any slippage.

The design will provide a wonderful focal point for reflection and conversation on the intersection of George and Albany Sts, and the sculptor commissioned for this memorial has a national and global reputation. His design is perfect for commemorating Baxter and all conscientious objectors to war.

Finally, the project is moving ahead with all consents in place. The Baxter Trust believes that it will be an icon for the city when it is finished by the end of the year.

Kevin Clements Baxter Trust chairman