STIRRED BY SHAKING
ARE WE PREPARED?
STRENGTHENING work on some earthquakevulnerable University of Otago buildings may be delayed due to the Covid19 financial fallout.
Current top priorities for earthquake upgrades and strengthening on the Dunedin campus include the 1920 Consumer and Applied Sciences Building, the 1910 Physical Education Building and the 1918 Scott Building.
These buildings and others on the priority list have been assessed at meeting only a fraction of the New Building Standard (NBS), or “code”, for Dunedin.
Responding to an Official Information Act request in midJuly, the university said its strengthening programme focused on pre1976 buildings identified as of seismic interest.
The university registrar’s office withheld detailed costs of previous strengthening work and also its estimated future costs, citing commercial sensitivity and claiming the release of the figures could prejudice future negotiations.
The university also declined to release reports on strengthening from the past decade, despite saying it “accepts that there is public interest in the seismic strength status of its buildings”.
However, in a written statement, chief operating officer Stephen Willis said the recent spend had been in the “millions” and more than $100 million could be spent on strengthening in the next 10 years or so, depending on affordability and Covid19.
In 2017, the university reviewed the condition of its buildings to prioritise work. Seismic rating was one criterion used to determine the priorities.
Top priorities for earthquake upgrades/strengthening, Covid19 permitting, include:
The Consumer and Applied Sciences Building (1920), which meets only 15% of the New Building Standard (NBS) for Dunedin. Occupants have been temporarily relocated.
Physical Education Building (1910), 2326% of NBS. Occupants have been temporarily relocated.
Union Court (1930), 27% of NBS. Occupants will be relocated and the building demolished next year.
Adams Building (1973), 30% of NBS. The upper floor has been vacated and work is under way to add restraints to the block spandrel panels. A replacement building is planned in the next 10year plan but will be subject to postCovid19 affordability.
Property Services (1920), 25% of NBS. Planning is under way to relocate the occupants and demolish the building when this is affordable.
Scott Building (1918), 25% of NBS.
71 Frederick St (1910), no NBS listed. Occupants will be relocated and the building demolished within the next 10 years, if affordable.
The NBS is based on a 500year return period hazard for ground motion from all sources in the area. In Dunedin, that has been calculated as about 0.1G, onetenth the acceleration of gravity.
A building assessed at 15% of code is 0.15 multiplied by 0.1G, which means it is believed able to withstand shaking of only 0.015G.
Mr Willis said the university’s seismic steering committee was also looking at other work, including smaller strengthening of chimneys and parapets.
“The speed at which we are identifying and strengthening buildings in Dunedin substantially exceeds the expectations set by legislation. In fact, it is our own policy that is driving the speed at which we are strengthening buildings.
“A significant portion of our planned preCovid capital plan had seismic strengthening as a major driver.”
If identified as quakeprone, the building was immediately put on the highpriority list, he said.