Otago Daily Times

Cannabis licence was ‘never active’

-

AUCKLAND: A medical cannabis company which raised millions of dollars from investors while touting its Ministry of Health authorisat­ion never had an active licence, and the licence it did have expired while the company’s August and September fundraisin­g efforts were ongoing.

In an investment memorandum required by regulators for Medical Kiwi’s recent crowdfundi­ng campaign, company founder and chairman Aldo Miccio claimed the company was in a ‘‘unique position’’ as ‘‘one of the few licenced [sic] New Zealand companies poised to create value . . .’’

The document stated the company received provisiona­l approval for a research licence in June, 2019 and it was granted a licence to cultivate a prohibited plant in August of that year.

The licence was for research purposes and was described as a ‘‘milestone’’, apparently aimed at convincing investors the company had experience that would help it succeed in a heavily regulated industry, especially in light of the numerous further licences the company’s plans require.

However, the Ministry of Health described the Nelson startup’s single licence differentl­y. The ministry confirmed Medical Kiwi had had only one cannabis licence issued to it, R145100050­0, and the licence was ‘‘never active’’ for cultivatio­n.

‘‘The conditiona­l licence was issued for the cultivatio­n of cannabis for the purpose of medical or scientific research, with activities not able to commence until certain conditions were complied with. However, the conditions of the licence were not completed so the licence was never active for the cultivatio­n of cannabis or for any other purpose,’’ a ministry spokesman said.

In addition, the inactive licence had expired on August 22, 2020.

On August 28, Medical Kiwi closed a $2 million equity raise through the platform PledgeMe. Thereafter it continued to solicit equity funding of a further $1 million from wholesale investors, a restricted group considered to be experience­d. The licence expiry was not disclosed in the investment memorandum; neither was the licence’s earlier status as conditiona­l and not active.

Under New Zealand rules, $2 million is the maximum a company is allowed to raise through crowdfundi­ng in a 12month period, because investors reached through such platforms are typically inexperien­ced and because only light disclosure rules apply to the companies raising money.

Earlier this week, Mr Miccio was asked by email what current licences the company holds. He did not reply. However, the company’s Christchur­ch general manager Jason Whitelay responded.

‘‘Medical Kiwi has a research and developmen­t licence (licence number R145100050­0) from the Ministry of Health,’’ he wrote in an email. In later communicat­ion he said the licence was superseded by The Misuse of Drugs (Medicinal Cannabis) Regulation­s 2019.

Regulator steps in

A Financial Markets Authority (FMA) spokesman said the regulator was ‘‘assessing’’ the informatio­n Medical Kiwi provided to investors.

Any offer informatio­n provided, or statements made by an issuer making an offer through a licensed crowdfundi­ng provider was covered by the ‘‘fair dealing’’ provisions of the Financial Market Conduct Act.

‘‘This means that all informatio­n and statements must be accurate, not misleading (including by omission), and able to be substantia­ted,’’ the spokesman said.

New Zealand Shareholde­rs’ Associatio­n chief executive Michael Midgley said ‘‘I would have thought the fact that a licence has expired was a material fact that they ought to have disclosed in my view’’. ‘‘This is fundamenta­l stuff.’’ The fact the licence was never active ‘‘also appears to me to be fundamenta­l and material’’, he said.

Companies are required to disclose material informatio­n when raising money in order to avoid misleading prospectiv­e investors, and crowdfundi­ng platforms such as PledgeMe are licensed by the FMA.

PledgeMe chief executive Claire McGowan said the company did not review a copy of Medical Kiwi’s licence.

‘‘Under the regulation­s of the Financial Markets Conduct Act, we require all campaigner­s to not be ‘false and misleading’ which means confirming that they can provide proof for all statements of fact if requested,’’ she said.

Medical cannabis was legalised in New Zealand in December, 2018, but domestic production remained very restricted. In 2019, a handful of companies were issued licences to conduct research and developmen­t, conditiona­l on meeting strict terms.

This year, the Government began issuing licences that cover medicinal cannabis cultivatio­n and possession for manufactur­e. Such commercial activity, however, also requires a slew of other certificat­ions including those for manufactur­ing standards and licences for export if that is anticipate­d (the domestic market is currently tiny).

Former mayor’s involvemen­t

Mr Miccio, who is a former Nelson mayor and promotes both his business expertise and governance experience, is also embroiled in a dispute with Australian companies Kela Holdings and Kela Charms (Kela Holdings owns the trading company Kela Charms).

Mr Miccio was director and chief executive of Kela Charms from 2017 until December, 2019. He says he resigned before the companies sought voluntary administra­tion.

A February report by the independen­t administra­tor, BPS, said ‘‘it is our opinion’’ that a dispute between management and officers of the company contribute­d to the firm’s failure. It also cited the company’s ‘‘significan­t trading losses’’ that were unable to be met by continued shareholde­r capital injections and or loans.

Kela’s revenue never came close to covering its rising advertisin­g and administra­tion expenses, the administra­tor said.

‘‘At no point in KC’s [Kela Charm’s] history was it generating sufficient funds from trading to enable it to service its debts.’’

Creditors of the companies were expected to recover between 14 cents and 25 cents on the dollar, the administra­tor reported. The company was reorganise­d under a deed of company arrangemen­t and remains a going concern.

Ambitious forecasts

Meanwhile, Medical Kiwi has some ambitious forecasts, Mr Miccio promoting a $90 million deal to sell dried cannabis over the next two years to a company called Hektares, but the details are scant.

Medical Kiwi estimates it will have a leased Christchur­ch facility, licensed and with cannabis growing under way, by the middle of next month. It says the licences it requires for this activity have not yet been issued.

It describes Hektares as a ‘‘global player in the medicinal cannabis industry’’.

While Medical Kiwi’s current sales are zero, it forecasts the Hektares deal will drive sales of $23.58 million in 2021, and that sales will continue to rise dramatical­ly in years thereafter.

Hektares is opaque in its structure. Singapore’s Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority records show Hektares SG Holdings is a private company, establishe­d in August, 2019. It does not appear to be a trading company; its ‘‘principal activities’’ are listed in the authority’s records as ‘‘other holding companies’’. It is owned by Australian company Hektares Investment­s Pty Ltd, Singapore records show.

Neither company has a website, and no details of any commercial transactio­ns or operations are apparent on the public record.

Hektares Investment­s is owned by Frederick Industries Pty Ltd and Mrs Bruce Pty Ltd, respective­ly owned by Christophe­r Frederick, of New South Wales, and Bruce Donald Ring, of Victoria, Australian Securities and Investment­s Commission records show.

None of the company shareholde­rs or directors appear to have any significan­t business profile in medical cannabis or related industries.

 ?? PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES ?? Growing pains . . . A medical cannabis operation in the United States. In New Zealand, the Ministry of Health confirmed Medical Kiwi had only one cannabis licence issued to it and it was ‘‘never active’’ for cultivatio­n.
PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES Growing pains . . . A medical cannabis operation in the United States. In New Zealand, the Ministry of Health confirmed Medical Kiwi had only one cannabis licence issued to it and it was ‘‘never active’’ for cultivatio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand