Otago Daily Times

Communicat­ion key measles message

-

COVID19 has loudly elbowed aside many other health issues this year, including measles.

But as the world waits and hopes for successful vaccines to deal with this new coronaviru­s, it is timely to reflect on what happened with measles in New Zealand last year.

A recently released review of the handling of last year’s outbreak shows the health sector response verged on a shambles.

That outbreak was the biggest New Zealand had experience­d since 1997, with 2185 notified cases, spread over 17 district health boards (including Southern) but with most cases in the Auckland region and disproport­ionately affecting Maori and Pacific population­s.

It was only two years after the World Health Organisati­on Regional Verificati­on Committee for Measles and Rubella Eliminatio­n in the Western Pacific granted New Zealand measles and rubella eliminatio­n status, defined as the absence of endemic measles transmissi­on for at least 12 months in the presence of a wellperfor­ming surveillan­ce system.

Since the last large measles outbreak in 1997 there had been some small outbreaks in New Zealand when the disease was brought in from overseas. Gaps in the vaccine coverage were well known. It was also known there was a resurgence in measles across the world so more of the disease coming across our border was not unexpected.

Measles is highly contagious, sometimes described as eight times more so than Covid19 and is not a disease to be taken lightly.

Before the measles vaccine was introduced in 1963, major epidemics internatio­nally killed an estimated 2.6 million people a year. There is not room here to itemise all that went wrong in the response to the New Zealand outbreak last year but it included poor planning, confused communicat­ion on many levels including with the public, slow and inadequate coordinati­on of the organisati­ons involved and lack of clarity around their responsibi­lities.

Reviewers found the entire outbreak management sector seemed to have been overwhelme­d before the outbreak began. They drew attention to frequent restructur­ing at the Ministry of Health which had left understaff­ing and capability gaps.

An illustrati­on of the lack of cohesion was that the National Health Coordinati­on Centre (NHCC) was not set up until there were 719 cases in the country, mostly in Auckland. Reviewers were not able to determine who was responsibl­e for the decision to activate the NHCC at the end of

August and the relevant minister was not informed in a briefing the week before.

The reviewers made 13 recommenda­tions for improvemen­ts needed for the management of any future outbreak including an urgent call for improvemen­t to Measles Mumps and Rubella (MMR) vaccinatio­n rates.

In February, a vaccinatio­n campaign for the estimated 300,000 15 to 30yearolds who are not fully protected from measles was announced. Probably because of the Covid19 crisis, we heard little until another press release at the end of July telling us 350,000 doses of the vaccine were available for the catchup campaign and district health boards would start rolling out their measles campaigns ‘‘shortly’’. We will be interested to see how boards intend to reach the young people, many of whom will have scant contact with health services.

This month, changes to the immunisati­on schedule mean infants will receive their first and second MMR vaccinatio­ns earlier at 12 months and 15 months (previously 15 months and 4 years). While this was signalled some time ago, news reports suggest this has not been well communicat­ed to parents.

Commenting on the review, Directorge­neral of Health Dr Ashley Bloomfield was reported as saying it identified important lessons which would inform preparatio­n for the introducti­on of a Covid19 immunisati­on programme. The ministry was working apace on the recommenda­tions, he said.

Better communicat­ion with the public about MMR vaccinatio­ns cannot come too soon.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand