Otago Daily Times

ORC chairman explains background to process

- JARED MORGAN jared.morgan@odt.co.nz

THE Otago Regional Council has answered criticism of its handling of the Manuheriki­a River minimum flows process and consultati­on on the eve of the public release of its findings.

The council is scheduled to release its summary of submission­s tomorrow on an issue which has polarised the opinions of users and interest groups.

Public submission­s closed on June 18, with those results already made available to key stakeholde­r the Manuhereki­a Reference Group (MRG).

The five flow options tabled range from 1200 litres per second up to 3000 litres per second.

In a statement, chairman Andrew Noone said it was important to understand the background.

In 2018, the council passed a resolution that any proposed minimum flow change needed to follow the process outlined in the national policy statement on freshwater management, including identifyin­g freshwater management units (FMUs), catchment management objectives, environmen­tal flows and allocation limits.

That required data collection and modelling, dependent on time and season, he said.

After views were heard from parties, the council elected to consult them on the best procedure, resulting in the creation of the reference group and advisory groups.

The reference group’s intent was to involve the community in discussion and work collective­ly to develop freshwater management options — something the council saw as crucial to the management unit process and developmen­t of its land and water regional plan, Mr Noone said.

This enabled understand­ing between parties and was not focused on finding ‘‘a solution’’.

‘‘This is important, given finding and implementi­ng solutions for water quality and water quantity is a longterm challenge that will unfold over a span of years.’’

The council looked to improve its approach to developing water management scenarios, and would take what was learned through the Manuheriki­a process into future engagement with other management units and rohe, he said.

‘‘The MRG discussion­s, along with community input, helped ORC develop the five scenarios for freshwater management in the Manuheriki­a that were tested with the wider community during the most recent consultati­on.’’

Mr Noone said the frustratio­n expressed by some parties was understand­able but at all times it had been clear the notificati­on date for the land and water plan was 2023.

‘‘Therefore, time has been afforded to the MRG to ensure it has the best informatio­n, including science, to inform discussion and considerat­ion of scenarios.’’

The division in views had played out at every point in the process, which was expected.

The Manuheriki­a was a complex catchment, with competing values and drivers. While every attempt had been made to narrow issues, the council understood it was the freshwater commission­ers who would determine the way forward for the catchment based on science and the legislativ­e framework.

Elected members were responsibl­e for what went into the land and water regional plan for notificati­on by the end of 2023, Mr Noone said.

‘‘At which point there will be further opportunit­y for the public to have their say through the notificati­on process and hearings.’’

❛ . . . finding and implementi­ng solutions for water quality and water quantity is a longterm challenge that will unfold over a span of years

 ?? PHOTO: STEPHEN JAQUIERY ?? The Otago Regional Council is considerin­g five flow options for the Manuheriki­a River which range from 1200 litres per second to 3000 litres per second.
PHOTO: STEPHEN JAQUIERY The Otago Regional Council is considerin­g five flow options for the Manuheriki­a River which range from 1200 litres per second to 3000 litres per second.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand