Country’s fuel security status kept under wraps
WELLINGTON: Officials are refusing to release briefings about how much fuel New Zealand has or should keep on shore.
In April, New Zealand became totally reliant on tankerimported fuel, after the Marsden Point Refinery ended processing.
It came amid a widespread international focus on resource security, as the Russian invasion of Ukraine and shutdowns of European gas pipes disrupted international supplies and prices of food and fuel.
Also, shipping and logistics routes were suffering ongoing bottlenecks triggered by the pandemic.
But despite an RNZ Official Information Act request, officials refused to release ministerial briefings about how much fuel New Zealand had or should keep on shore.
In February, Minister of Energy and Resource Dr Megan Woods said none of New Zealand’s fuel supply was from Russia or Russian products, and the International Energy Agency had advised that world oil production capacity could meet any disruptions caused by the Russian war on Ukraine.
New Zealand also had access to strategic reserves overseas, she said.
However, in March, Dr Woods asked officials to hurry up with a report on mandatory onshore holdings.
The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment told RNZ it had since provided two briefings to her.
However, it said because the minister was still considering them, it would not release them to protect the confidentiality of the advice
A Christchurch commercial lawyer who specialises in infrastructure and construction said potential supply vulnerabilities were crucial concern given the wider international environment.
Buddle Findlay special counsel Bassam Maghzal said it was vital that New Zealand carefully consider its minimum onshore stockholding requirements for fuel wholesalers in case of fuel supply shocks.
Rationing, such as New Zealand’s ‘‘carless days’’ imposed during the 1979 fuel crisis, might not be such a distant prospect as it once was.
‘‘One would assume a ‘carless day’ is part of New Zealand’s efforts to decarbonise the economy — but this risks missing the point about New Zealand’s energy security and how quickly our economy could unravel if New Zealand was deprived of sufficient fuel supplies for as little as 24 days,’’ Mr Maghzal said.
While relying completely on international supply meant New Zealand was no longer so exposed to a singlepoint vulnerability where disruption to refining at Marsden Point could have created problems, ‘‘if New Zealand was unable to physically import refined fuels, we won’t be able to refine the oil we produce locally’’.
The long delay for shipping to reach New Zealand also made it vital that enough reserves be held, he said.
If changes were made to increase the amount of fuel reserves held onshore, the sooner plans were set in motion the better, as there would likely be a lag before those amounts could be met, Mr Maghzal said. — RNZ