Police photo taking practices ‘unlawful’

WELLINGTON: Crime fighting will not be hindered by stopping police taking masses of photos of people unlawfully, Deputy Privacy Commissioner Liz MacPherson says.

An official inquiry found police took and stored tens of thousands of digital photos for at least a decade without a good reason.

Police said they had ceased taking photos of young people but photo taking remained important to investigations.

Police were taking legal advice. ‘‘We welcome any action the police are taking to clarify their responsibility,’’ Ms MacPherson said.

The investigation — carried out by the Privacy Commission and Independent Police Conduct Authority — had determined practices were unlawful, and policies and training had been missing for years, she said.

‘‘Police do need to change their practices — it is the hope . . . that police take that opportunity to change, and take it now.’’

The Government said it was open to any advice police might have about where to strike the balance between privacy and evidence gathering.

However, Ms MacPherson said her office was not under political pressure.

‘‘What we’ve said very clearly in the report is that there are some current practices that are unlawful.

‘‘We’ve also said that if the police feel and have evidence that the collecting of information about young people who haven’t committed a crime, or who haven’t been convicted, is a deterrent in some way, shape or form, then they need to provide the evidence for that,’’ Ms MacPherson said.

‘‘And they need to take that through a policy process and put it in front of Parliament.’’

For 15 years, police took duplicate photos of young Maori in custody — though this was unlawful, it had even become a training requirement for new officers to do it.

A Privacy Commission compliance notice nine months ago ordered a stop to it.

There is also pressure on police to stop routinely taking photos of drivers at traffic stops and checkpoints, or using these to collect intelligence on gangs, unless it is justifiable.

Police have said complying with the notice was causing them ‘‘significant’’ challenges in fighting crime.

That initial reaction from police was ‘‘disappointing’’, Ms MacPherson said.

‘‘It will not stop fighting crime. ‘‘If the police were investigating a ramraid, the Privacy Act would not stop them doing that. Same goes for gangs.

‘‘The threshold that we’ve set in the report is that there only needs to be a reasonable possibility that that photograph is relevant for either a current investigation or a likely investigation.

‘‘So from that perspective, there is nothing stopping the police from undertaking that lawful intelligence gathering.

‘‘The Privacy Act will, in fact, support them in securing information in a lawful way, and also help build trust with the very communities that they’re trying to keep safe,’’ she said.

The first three progress reports on deleting photos and stopping taking them are now on the police website. These raised further questions.

For instance, police commissioner Andrew Coster said earlier they had deleted 6000 photos nine months after the Office of the Privacy Commissioner told them to.

But the first report said that by March this year they had already deleted almost twice that — 11,000.

The latest one said four out of 14 tasks had been completed: stopping taking ‘‘casual’’ photos or fingerprints from young people in public or in custody, and deleting photos of young people in custody taken unlawfully.

The other 10 were being worked on. However, one of those 10 requirements — that officers stopped using devices, including smartphones, not connected to the National Intelligence Application (NIA) to take photos of adults in custody — had been completed only ‘‘as far as reasonably practical’’.

The NIA has an automated system for purging photos that are not needed for investigations, but thousands of photos lie scattered in other police systems, or simply on their phones, out of reach of periodic purges. — RNZ