Otago Daily Times

Pushback against fluoride move

- STAFF REPORTER

NOT everyone is applauding the Waitaki District Council’s recent move to call a halt to the fluoridati­on of the Oamaru water supply.

The New Zealand Dental Associatio­n said, when contacted, it was concerned about delays to fluoridati­ng water supplies and the extension of its availabili­ty in communitie­s where it was technicall­y feasible.

The council earlier this week requested an extension on the directive to fluoridate issued by the Ministry of Health, which will affect Oamaru’s water supply by the end of June.

The move was met with applause by members of Waitaki’s antifluori­de community, which last month delivered the council a 554signatu­re petition asking for it to stop all fluoridati­on plans.

New Zealand Dental Associatio­n dental policy director Dr Robin Whyman said the directorge­neral of health had invited written comments from the relevant local authority on the costs of adding fluoride to the local water supply, including additional costs of ongoing management and monitoring. But the facts spoke for themselves, Dr Whyman said. Ongoing research over many years had shown the effectiven­ess of community water fluoridati­on in reducing the burden of dental decay, he said.

‘‘A comprehens­ive 2017 review in Australia reported that community water fluoridati­on reduced tooth decay by 2644% in children and adolescent­s and by 27% in adults,’’ he said.

Cr Jim Hopkins asked at the meeting whether it was possible for consumers of a water source to give informed consent and said he wished there would be more academic debate on the issue.

The New Zealand Dental Associatio­n says the balance between considerat­ion of the scientific issues associated with fluoridati­on by the directorge­neral of health and input on costs and technical issues through consultati­on with the local authority is the correct balance of decisionma­king. The directorge­neral must also consider scientific evidence on the effectiven­ess of adding fluoride to a drinking water supply.

‘‘This includes the likely state of oral health of the community where the water supply is situated, the numbers of people receiving water from the supply and the likely financial costs and savings,’’ Dr Whyman said. ‘‘Tooth decay has the potential to cause significan­t harm, and does lead to the hospitalis­ation of children and adults each year in New Zealand,’’ Dr Whyman said.

In 2014 the Chief Science Adviser for the Prime Minister and the Royal Society of New Zealand published a comprehens­ive report confirming that at the levels used in New Zealand water fluoridati­on was both safe and effective.

‘‘A further update review published in 2021 by the Prime Minister’s chief science adviser confirmed the conclusion­s of the 2014 report,’’ Dr Whyman said.

The order to fluoridate was sent to 14 councils around New Zealand in 2022 by then directorge­neral of health Sir Ashley Bloomfield.

The decision was found to be unlawful in November last year by the High Court, as Sir Ashley did not make considerat­ion of the Bill of Rights Act, which allows anybody to refuse medical treatment.

The Ministry of Health is appealing the decision and whether the order will stand is still unknown.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand