Crossparty inquiry to focus on climate change
MPS from all parties will investigate how New Zealand can prepare and adapt for the effects of climate change.
Parliament agreed on Thursday to establish a crossparty inquiry, which will consider how adapting to more frequent and severe weather events should be funded, and how responsibilities should be shared.
The inquiry, led by the finance and expenditure committee, will report back in September and its recommendations will be used to help develop legislation to be introduced early next year.
Climate Change Minister Simon Watts said damaging weather events would only become more severe and frequent over time, and an ‘‘enduring and longterm approach’’ was needed to provide people with certainty.
Former climate change minister and Green MP James Shaw, who left Parliament last week, announced an environment committee inquiry into climate adaptation and managed retreat in August last year.
The committee did not report back before the election and its work has been stalled until now.
The new inquiry would replace the previous one, and would consider the 150 submissions that had already been received, Mr Watts said.
A further call for public submissions was likely.
Mr Watts did not say whether the inquiry would also consider an expert working group report into managed retreat, which had been before the previous inquiry.
The terms of reference for the new inquiry do not specifically mention retreat, or the resource management system, which local government authorities have criticised as inadequate for preventing natural hazardprone development.
The finance and expenditure committee was the appropriate committee to undertake the inquiry, as it contained politicians from all parties, Mr Watts said.
He had discussed it with both government and opposition MPs and was ‘‘immensely grateful for the support expressed thus far for this work’’.
The committee would consider the ‘‘nature of the climate adaptation problem New Zealand faces’’, along with how adaptation costs could be shared, and who would assume responsibility.
The Greens welcomed ‘‘the continuation’’ of work on climate adaptation.
Mr Watts previously said the current response to climate changerelated weather events was ‘‘not a sustainable model’’.
‘‘We’re seeing very ad hoc responses to emergency events, we’re seeing ad hoc decisions around house buyouts across the country, and we’re seeing variation between council to council, in the way in which the Crown interacts with that as well.’’
A paper published by Niwa and University of Auckland last year found just over 440,000 houses, sheds and sleepouts are in known floodrisk areas, with an estimated replacement value of $218 billion.
And research published in 2020 by the Climate Sigma group, looking at just the main centres, projected that 10,000 coastal homes would face full insurance retreat — where insurance is either not available at all or becomes prohibitively expensive — by 2050.
The expert working group report before the previous inquiry set out a basic framework for adaptation.
The group suggested that regionallevel authorities would first identify general areas at risk within a region before detailed risk assessments were done by technical experts.
The affected communities would then be fully involved in identifying and choosing the solutions for a ‘‘local adaptation plan’’, which might include planned relocation for all or part of an area when a threshold — such as a specific sea level rise — was met.
The report recommended full compensation for homeowners who had to relocate, and slightly less for landlords and businesses. Owners of baches and other second homes would only get help with demolition or removal costs.
In addition, a proposed National Policy Statement on natural hazard decisionmaking, drafted under the previous government last year, would direct councils to give greater weight to natural hazards when considering new resource consents.
That statement is also waiting for a response from the government. — RNZ