Rotorua Daily Post

Minister grilled over nurses

Queried as to why nurses wait two years for residency

-

The Government

does not have a shred of evidence

that migrant nurses leave their

profession after gaining residence.

Erica Stanford

New Immigratio­n Minister Michael Wood is standing by a decision to leave nurses off a fast-track residency pathway even after the boss of the new health agency said changing that would be a “priority”.

On Friday, Health NZ interim chief executive Margie Apa told Today FM they were working with officials to support more nurses coming into the country.

It comes after nursing and midwives unions called immigratio­n settings that leave their workforce off a green list guaranteei­ng residency for certain profession­s “sexist”.

Nurses, of which the main nurses union estimates the country to be about 4000 short, have to work two years here in the profession before getting residency.

Meanwhile, under the fast-track system, specific other profession­als including doctors can receive it immediatel­y.

National’s Immigratio­n spokeswoma­n Erica Stanford questioned Wood about the settings during an Education and Workforce Committee meeting yesterday.

She said there was no justificat­ion for making nurses wait the two years.

She asked for Wood for evidence, but he responded the policy was “based on logic and common sense rather than any particular evidence”.

“This proves what National has been saying for months that the Government does not have a shred of evidence that migrant nurses leave

their profession after gaining residence,” Stanford said following the meeting.

“The immigratio­n minister said this morning the difference between straight-to-residency and the twoyear work to residence pathway is determined by the ‘degree of specialisa­tion’.

“If that’s the case, how is it that civil or electrical engineerin­g technician­s who only require a level 6 diploma are fast-tracked, but nurses who specialise in paediatric­s, surgical and critical care and require bachelor’s degrees with significan­t experience have to wait two years to apply for residence?

“The only common sense and logic that the minister should be applying is that nurses will continue to choose Australia, which is rolling out the red carpet in comparison. It’s that simple.”

During the meeting, Wood said applying the degree of specialisa­tion to a sector meant they were less likely to leave that profession once they arrive here.

“On the whole it seems less likely someone who works in a highlyspec­ialised area will find employment in a different role.”

The two-year requiremen­t was also applied to sectors where there was a “real need” for them to remain, he said.

Stanford also pressed Wood on challenges facing the hospitalit­y sector, which historical­ly employed many on working holiday visas.

As of June 15, just 1681 people had arrived here on those visas, compared to 50-70,000 annually, Stanford said.

In comes as Covid cases are tracking upwards, which experts are

partly pinning on opened borders.

After Omicron first began spreading across Auckland in late summer, the region saw an early-march peak that preceded a “Mexican wave” of cases throughout the country, and some DHB areas didn’t record their highest daily counts until a month later.

This time, however, cases across regions are climbing roughly in step — and quickly.

Since the beginning of last week, the seven-day rolling average of cases per 100,000 had jumped from 88.4 to 131.7 in Auckland; 68.8 to 98.6 in Waikato; and 63.4 to 102 in Bay of Plenty.

Covid-19 modeller Professor Michael Plank said one big contributo­r was the rise of the faster-spreading Omicron subtype BA.5.

— NZ Herald

 ?? ?? National’s Erica Stanford says there is no justificat­ion making nurses wait two years for New Zealand residency.
National’s Erica Stanford says there is no justificat­ion making nurses wait two years for New Zealand residency.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand