Sunday News

Why I’m backing the boomerang kids

Moving in with mum and dad often makes clear financial sense.

-

If you look up ‘‘feckless, entitled millennial’’ in the dictionary, you will see a picture of a dishevelle­d manchild named Michael Rotondo. This 30-year-old US mooch made headlines around the world after refusing to leave his parents’ basement, where he’d been lurking for eight years – even after they served five notices and took him to court.

While this cartoonish farce made for a great story, Rotondo’s living situation is not unusual. Western countries are experienci­ng a mass migration of 20-somethings returning to the parental nest. In New Zealand, more than 150,000 adults still lived withmumand dad in 2013 – a number that has no doubt grown rapidly.

Pity the parents of the ‘‘Boomerang Generation’’. A recent study by the London School of Economics found that the return of adult children caused a decline in quality of life equivalent to suffering an age-related disability – ie, having the kids back again cramps your style as much as losing the ability to walk.

And so, I felt more than a little uneasy about my own visit home recently. No sooner had my parents managed to empty the nest—after 30 years of raising their brood—then I turned up at the airport looking for a spare bed to crash in.

Fortunatel­y, it’s been much more harmonious than when I last lived at home as a teenager. I’ve noticed that quite a few of my peers have swallowed their pride and moved back in with their folks while they study or save money, and now I don’t think it’s such a bad idea.

Traditiona­lly, moving back home was seen as a sign of defeat. These days, with an accommodat­ion shortage and million-dollar house prices, it seems more like a savvy financial strategy. My brother and his wife moved home while they were saving up a house deposit. Instead of becoming basement-dwelling troglodyte­s, they’re now happily ensconced in their own place.

I don’t think this is any different to receiving a loan or gift from the Bank of Mumand Dad, which these days is almost a necessity for getting a foot on the property ladder. In some cases, boomerangi­ng is the smarter option: my parents don’t have a whole lot of spare cash to divert away from their own retirement, but they do have a big, empty house with an attached flat.

Navigating this intergener­ational living situation requires some ground rules. Boomerang kids have to pull their weight and live like flatmates, not as children. There has to be a clear exit strategy. If parents make the family home too comfortabl­e, they’ll end up with a Rotondo on their hands. AP Bailing adult children out of every sticky financial situation stunts their developmen­t. Sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind.

It’s worth rememberin­g that two or three generation­s sharing one home is completely normal in most cultures. It’s only considered weird in the West, and even that’s a fairly recent phenomenon. The current belief that everyone ought to be atomised individual­s living alone in empty houses is also inefficien­t, and given the current housing situation, not always practical.

I won’t exactly be heartbroke­n to wave goodbye to my parents later this month, and perhaps they’ll feel the same way. But it was a surprising­ly OK experience. While there’s definitely something grotesque about a Peter Pan-style adult child who refuses to grow up, clear expectatio­ns and a few firm ground rules can make it work for everyone. Got a burning money question? Email Budget Buster at richard.meadows@thedeepdis­h.org, or hit him up on Facebook, where you can also find links to previous Budget Busters.

 ??  ?? Michael Rotondo is the worst example of adult, stayat-home children – but it can work if you set some groundrule­s.
Michael Rotondo is the worst example of adult, stayat-home children – but it can work if you set some groundrule­s.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand