Sunday Star-Times

Tough at the top

Busting leadership myths

-

Kiwi organisati­ons are facing a growing number of leadership challenges as they move through the 21st century.

Intense media and social media scrutiny, evolving regulatory requiremen­ts, demographi­c changes and demands for greater sustainabi­lity are some of the elements creating a tough new set of demands.

Then there’s the digital revolution, which has fundamenta­lly altered the way most companies interact with their suppliers and customers.

The task for today’s leaders is managing the turmoil of the present while creating a sustainabl­e future and protecting – or in some cases re-establishi­ng – the identity of their organisati­ons.

Research by Deloitte shows organisati­ons with strong leaders are 2.3 times more likely to financiall­y outperform peers.

Conversely, organisati­ons who are perceived to have ineffectiv­e leadership experience a 19.8 per cent equity discount. Organisati­ons therefore see tangible business benefits from investing in leaders, and investors notice.

The substantia­l impact leaders have on business performanc­e goes a long way to explaining the size of the leadership developmen­t market. Globally, its value is estimated at $58 billion–$87b and in New Zealand it is estimated at $145 million–$218m.

But despite the large amounts of money being spent in this area, there is a significan­t amount of scepticism. Deloitte’s 2016 human capital survey identifies leadership as the number two concern among HR and business leaders based in Australia and New Zealand.

This signals it is a priority issue on New Zealand’s executive agenda, not surprising, considerin­g 40 per cent of respondent­s stated their current leadership programmes provided only some value and 24 per cent said they yielded little or no value.

Further results from the Australasi­an survey respondent­s revealed that just 24 per cent said they were excellent at providing leadership programmes for all levels (new, next generation, senior leaders).

What’s more, 60 per cent reported they were weak in providing focused leadership programmes for millennial­s.

These results suggest the leadership developmen­t world continues to be dominated by myths and fads and programmes that often promote superficia­l solutions which appear effective, but fail to help leaders learn and do not deliver measurable results.

Looking past the latest fads, there are a few steps that organisati­ons can take to address the leadership issue.

Build leadership programmes on a foundation of evidence:

Insights from data can help organisati­ons identify what makes successful leaders. Rigorous analysis should inform every step of the leadership developmen­t process, including candidate identifica­tion, developmen­t, coaching and career progressio­n.

Use robust assessment to improve the return on leadership developmen­t spend:

The usual methods organisati­ons use to identify leaders’ capabiliti­es and developmen­t needs are via manager assessment­s and selfassess­ments. But these are subject to bias and lack objectivit­y. Highperfor­ming companies employ third parties to carry out evidenceba­sed, in-depth profiling of leaders and benchmarki­ng, as this allows them to accurately pinpoint skill gaps and design effective and targeted learning programs.

Take a fresh, hard look at leadership developmen­t strategy:

High-performing companies don’t just outspend their competitor­s on leadership (by almost four times), but they also spend smarter. They develop an integrated system of leadership that includes a specific leadership strategy, assessment­s to measure individual and team capability, research-driven content and blended learning programmes with stretch assignment­s, intensive coaching and continuous opportunit­ies for leadership developmen­t.

Identify leaders early:

Perhaps it’s the famous ‘she’ll be right’ attitude that gets Kiwi organisati­ons in trouble. Andy Clayton

The ability to find great leaders as early as possible is an important way to deepen the leadership talent pool and promote dramatic change. The use of evidence and analytics can identify leaders who can be ‘‘fast-tracked’’ to roles where, on paper, they have little or no experience.

Identify and foster teams of leaders:

An important goal for most organisati­ons is to develop new models of leadership teams, combining leaders of different generation­s and perspectiv­es. For many organisati­ons this is a new focus and will be critical in the future when they will need both teams of leaders and leaders who can drive and motivate teams.

Perhaps it’s the famous ‘‘she’ll be right’’ attitude that gets Kiwi organisati­ons in trouble in terms of developing leaders. It’s often thought that great leaders are ‘‘naturals’’ and don’t have to work at it. But that is just another myth. Leadership can be the result of a deliberate plan combined with measurable evaluation. It’s something that can be worked at, not just reserved for the lucky few who get it at birth.

 ?? SHUTTERSTO­CK ?? Leadership is a strategic differenti­ator.
SHUTTERSTO­CK Leadership is a strategic differenti­ator.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand