Sunday Star-Times

Assad and brother linked to attacks

Investigat­ors connect the Syrian leader and other top figures in his regime to a series of bombings using chlorine weapons.

- Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, weapons specialist

Internatio­nal investigat­ors have said for the first time that they suspect Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his brother are responsibl­e for the use of chemical weapons in the Syrian conflict, according to a document seen by Reuters.

The use of chemical weapons is banned under internatio­nal law and could constitute a war crime.

A joint inquiry for the United Nations and global watchdog the Organisati­on for the Prohibitio­n of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) had previously identified only military units and did not name any commanders or officials.

Now a list has been produced of individual­s whom the investigat­ors have linked to a series of chlorine bomb attacks in 2014-15 – including Assad, his younger brother Maher and other high-ranking figures – indicating that the decision to use toxic weapons came from the very top, according to a source familiar with the inquiry.

The Assads could not be reached for comment but a Syrian government official said accusation­s that government forces had used chemical weapons had ‘‘no basis in truth’’.

The government has repeatedly denied using such weapons during the civil war, which is almost six years old, saying all the attacks highlighte­d by the inquiry were the work of rebels or the Islamic State militant group.

The list, which has been seen by Reuters but has not been made public, was based on a combinatio­n of evidence compiled by the UN-OPCW team in Syria and informatio­n from Western and regional intelligen­ce agencies, according to the source, who declined to be identified due to the sensitivit­y of the issue.

The inquiry is led by a panel of three independen­t experts, supported by a team of technical and administra­tive staff. It is mandated by the UN Security Council to identify individual­s and organisati­ons responsibl­e for chemical attacks in Syria.

Virginia Gamba, the head of the inquiry, denied that any list of individual suspects had yet been compiled.

While the inquiry has no judicial powers, any naming of suspects could lead to their prosecutio­n. Syria is not a member of the Internatio­nal Criminal Court (ICC), but alleged war crimes could be referred to the court by the security council – something Syria’s ally Russia is sure to block.

It is unclear whether the United Nations or OPCW will publish the list separately.

The list identifies 15 people ‘‘to be scrutinise­d in relation to use of CW The decisions would be made at the highest levels initially and then delegated down. Hence, the first use would need to be authorised by Assad. (chemical weapons) by Syrian Arab Republic Armed Forces in 2014 and 2015’’. It does not specify what role they are suspected of playing, but lists their titles.

The list is split into three sections. The first, titled ‘‘Inner Circle President’’, lists six people, including Assad and his brother, who commands the elite 4th Armoured Division, the defence minister and the head of military intelligen­ce.

The second section names the air force chief as well as four commanders of air force divisions. They include the heads of the 22nd Air Force Division and the 63rd Helicopter Brigade, units that the inquiry has previously said dropped chlorine bombs.

The third part of the list – ‘‘Other relevant Senior Mil Personnel’’ – names two colonels and two major-generals.

Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, an independen­t specialist in biological and chemical weapons who monitors Syria, said the list reflected the military chain of command.

‘‘The decisions would be made at the highest levels initially and then delegated down. Hence, the first use would need to be authorised by Assad,’’ said de Bretton-Gordon, a former commander of British and Nato chemical and biological defence divisions who frequently visits Syria for profession­al consultanc­y work.

The Syrian defence ministry and air force could not be reached for comment.

Syria joined the internatio­nal Chemical Weapons Convention under a United States-Russian deal that followed the deaths of hundreds of civilians in a sarin gas attack in Ghouta on the outskirts of Damascus in August 2013. It was the deadliest use of chemicals in warfare since the 1988 Halabja massacre at the end of the Iran-Iraq War, which killed at least 5000 people in Iraqi Kurdistan.

The Syrian government, which denied its forces were behind the Ghouta attack, also agreed to hand over its declared stockpile of 1300 tonnes of toxic weaponry and dismantle its chemical weapons programme under internatio­nal supervisio­n.

The UN and the OPCW have been investigat­ing whether Damascus is adhering to its commitment­s under the agreement, which averted the threat of US-led military interventi­on.

The bodies appointed the panel of experts to conduct the inquiry, and its mandate runs until November.

The panel published a report in October last year which said Syrian government forces used chemical weapons at least three times in 2014-15, and that Islamic State used mustard gas in 2015.

That report identified Syria’s 22nd Air Force Division and 63rd Helicopter Brigade as having dropped chlorine bombs, and said people ‘‘with effective control in the military units . . . must be held accountabl­e’’.

The US this week blackliste­d 18 senior Syrian officials based on the October report – some of whom also appear on the list seen by Reuters – but not Assad or his brother.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand