Sunday Star-Times

What’s in a Fairtrade name?

Cadbury’s chocolate owners are pulling out of Fairtrade certificat­ion. But how does their own ethical mark measure up?

- by Rob Stock

It’s not only Dunedin that Cadbury owner Mondelez is pulling out of. It’s also pulling out of the Fairtrade system.

For the rest of the year Cadbury Dairy Milk bars will continue to sport the famous green, black and blue Fairtrade logo proclaimin­g the cocoa was sourced without slave and child labour, and meeting other tough, Fairtrade standards.

But in 2018, the label will be replaced by the Mondelezin­vented, green, Cocoa Life logo.

It’s not a straight swap as there are big difference­s between the independen­t Fairtrade and the Mondelez-owned Cocoa Life programmes.

Mondelez however has hired Fairtrade to monitor the ten ‘‘key performanc­e indicators’’ (KPIs) of Cocoa Life.

In addition, the Fairtrade ‘‘corporate’’ logo, which is similar to the Fairtrade mark, may appear on the reverse of Cadbury’s CocoaLife-marked bars.

Neither Fairtrade nor Mondelez has published a comparison of Fairtrade and Cocoa Life.

Asked whether there could be chocolate sold under the Cocoa Life label, that would not meet the tough standards of the Fairtrade logo, neither Fairtrade nor Mondelez answered with a ‘‘yes’’ or a ‘‘no’’.

Fairtrade said: ‘‘Chocolate bearing the Cocoa Life label would not meet the same standards for bearing the Fairtrade label, as it has not been independen­tly certified.’’

Mondelez said: ‘‘Cocoa Life is a different programme, which is why it carries the Cocoa Life logo instead. However, as previously mentioned, Fairtrade has stated... they would not have partnered in the program if farmers or communitie­s would be in any way worse off.’’

Some in the ethical trade world believe Fairtrade had little choice but to back the Mondelez move after the US fair trade movement

split to go it alone, leaving Cadbury as its largest Fairtrade revenue source.

Fairtrade said: ‘‘The reality is that the world has changed from 25 years ago when the Fairtrade mark was first proposed. Back then, most large chocolate companies did not know where their cocoa was coming from. Fairtrade certificat­ion of Cadbury Dairy Milk in 2009 signified a real breakthrou­gh in the mainstream chocolate world.’’

Increasing­ly, companies like Mondelez wanted to ‘‘take more control’’ by developing their own programmes, Fairtrade said.

Not everyone is enthusiast­ic about more control returning to the multi-nationals whose

industries Fairtrade was created to clean up.

Bob Doherty, a professor from the University of York in the UK, said the Cadbury move would ‘‘undermine the good progress that has been made’’.

‘‘The real danger lies in the fact that other major players are also building their own private schemes,’’ he wrote. ‘‘This clearly opens up the possibilit­y they too will opt out of the independen­t certificat­ion scheme.’’

‘‘If this does come to pass, consumers will be left unable to properly assess and compare the benefits to farmers being offered by the different chocolate brands. And that favours the big companies far more than it does those growing the cocoa.’’

CHILD, SLAVE, AND FORCED LABOUR

The US Department of Labor produces an annual report on products sold in to US consumers produced in part by slave and child labour. Cocoa is among them. One of the pillars of the Fairtrade programme was that chocolatem­akers had to prove their cocoa was not produced with any child, or slave labour.

Another of the prescripti­ve duties which make the Fairtrade scheme so tough, is the requiremen­t to ‘‘Ensure that there is no forced labour of any form, including bonded and involuntar­y prison labour’’.

Fairtrade said: ‘‘Failure to have adequate systems in place, including continuous monitoring, leads to suspension and finally decertific­ation if the producer organisati­on does not address the problem.’’

Compare that to one of the 10 KPIs of Cocoa Life, which says the ‘‘reduction in child labour and forced child labour’’.

Mondelez said it was committed to ‘‘playing our part in eradicatin­g child labour in supply chains. We believe that Cocoa Life provides us with the best opportunit­y to address the root causes of child labour through specific actions we take to combat the issue and the holistic, community-focused approach of the programme.’’

‘‘Specific actions we take are to identify and address any instances of child labour that we do discover, and shine a spotlight on the issue by working with industry partners, NGOs, campaigner­s, consumers and government,’’ it said. ‘‘Our natural goal is to eventually eradicate child labour completely, and by addressing the root causes,’’ Mondelez said.

GROWERS’ VOICES

Cocoa growers are part-owners of Fairtrade. ‘‘Our global system is 50 per cent owned by producers representi­ng farmer and worker organisati­ons,’’ it says. That gives them an equal voice. ‘‘Producers have a say in decision-making within our General Assembly and on Fairtrade Internatio­nal’s Board of Directors.’’ Cocoa Life is 100 per cent owned by Mondelez, though it uses the language of partnershi­p with farmers in its publicity materials like its 2015 progress report.

It ‘‘listens’’ to farmers. ‘‘When entering into new communitie­s,’’ the 2015 report reads. ‘‘Cocoa Life conducts a thorough participat­ory needs assessment, that allows the team to identify priorities in the region and map the various communitie­s. As part of the needs assessment process, the team visits some 25 per cent of all registered farmers in the community.’’

Mondelez says two of its KPIs are: ‘‘Increase of capacity in the community to plan and advocate for their own social developmen­t’’ and ‘‘An increase in women’s participat­ion in the decisionma­king process’’.

SCALE

Cocoa Life is more ‘‘scalable’’ than Fairtrade.

Mondelez wants the Cocoa Life label on five times more of its chocolate than currently bears the Fairtrade label.

There is a pending cocoa supply crisis.

With a growing taste for chocolate in countries like China and India, demand has to grow to ensure there is enough cocoa to go round, which means that decades of misery and poverty for cocoa farmers and workers has to end.

Companies like Mondelez are saying it is in their own interests to see cocoa farmers get a better deal by lifting productivi­ty of cocoa farmers.

‘‘The reality is that without successful farmers and thriving cocoa-growing communitie­s to produce our cocoa, we cannot bring consumers the chocolate they love,’’ Mondelez said.

‘‘But today, farmers and cocoagrowi­ng communitie­s face serious challenges, with most cocoa farms operating at a cash subsistenc­e level. Many organisati­ons are working hard to improve the lives and livelihood of farmers and their communitie­s but more needs to be done.’’

It said: ‘‘The average age of a cocoa farmer is 55, and without meaningful action, too many of the next generation will turn away from cocoa farming.’’

While the language of Fairtrade is human dignity and human rights, the language of Cocoa Life is more the language of investment.

‘‘Cocoa Life works to help farmers improve productivi­ty. Cocoa Life works closely with farmers to help tackle poor harvests, low farmer incomes, and poor community developmen­t – to directly address the productivi­ty challenges facing many cocoa farmers today.’’

PRICE

The Fairtrade scheme guarantees a minimum price for growers. This floor hasn’t been needed in years.

Fairtrade said: ‘‘The partnershi­p with Cocoa Life will ensure that farmers receive a competitiv­e price for their cocoa, on clear terms of trade, and loyalty payments, which together with programme investment­s, will deliver value per farmer at least equivalent to that previously delivered by Fairtrade premiums.’’

 ??  ?? The real danger lies in the fact that other major players are also building their own private schemes.
The real danger lies in the fact that other major players are also building their own private schemes.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand