Sunday Star-Times

Is meth horror overblown?

Are property managers and testers overcookin­g the meth scourge, or should landlords be really concerned? Chris Hutching reports.

-

Insurance claims for methamphet­amine decontamin­ation make up just 3 per cent of of all landlord claims. Some real estate agencies have used the methamphet­amine scare as a reason for landlords to employ their management services.

First National chief executive Bob Brereton recently said landlords managing their own properties were taking unnecessar­y risks.

He cited work by one testing company showing a high percentage of homes tested positive in Auckland, Wellington and Christchur­ch, although it was unclear if the findings were at toxic levels or low residues.

Brereton cited a decontamin­ation case costing $20,000. But insurance figures show the most common claims were for internal water damage from leaking pipes and overflows (30 per cent), weatherrel­ated claims (20 per cent), deliberate damage by tenants (15 per cent), and meth damage 3 per cent.

The data was collected by Initio Insurance for the Auckland Property Investors Associatio­n

The insurance cost of meth contaminat­ion out of all claims was about 6 per cent.

While water, weather, and deliberate damage claims made up 65 per cent of all claims, they only account for 30 per cent of costs.

Fire made up just over 5 per cent of claims, but cost almost 60 per cent of the value of claims paid.

Initio said the single most common cause for claims was leaking water pipes, especially in older homes where maintenanc­e had fallen behind.

Fires caused by wiring and electronic­s failure were the most damaging.

One of the most common sources was overloaded multi-plugs and wall sockets.

Property Investors Federation executive officer Andrew King, said

meth contaminat­ion was a big problem but only for a few landlords.

‘‘The old limits were low and detected small residues. The new standards will allow more tolerance. Often there’s more harm done through the stress of thinking you have a contaminat­ed house.

‘‘We’ll never get rid of methamphet­amine, but we know more about it now and the levels that are toxic,’’ King said.

Meanwhile, Brereton claimed property managers would pick up any problems quicker than landlords because they knew what to look for and kept regular checks on tenants.

He said property managers typically charged around 7.5 per cent of the weekly rent and managed letting the property, maintenanc­e, and early notificati­on of legal compliance.

‘‘It’s too big a risk for first time property investors to take on their own. They need to engage profession­als to provide an additional line of defence,’’ Brereton said.

IAG has produced a new guide to landlord responsibi­lities and ‘‘ is working through insurance policy wording changes to ensure greater consistenc­y’’ about levels of cover available for all homeowners.

Claim acceptance will be based on the presence of contaminat­ion, irrespecti­ve of whether it was caused through manufactur­e or use.

The maximum claimable amount for most policies will rise from $25,000 to $30,000.

However, there will be an increase on IAG excesses for methamphet­amine contaminat­ion claims from $400 to $2500.

‘‘This is to ensure homeowners are incentivis­ed to make efforts to minimise losses by doing what they can to protect their homes,’’ IAG said.

Most contaminat­ion claims involve rental properties, and premiums across landlord policies will increase from between $40 to $130 per annum.

Claims will not be accepted for contaminat­ion to contents in homes, because IAG said it was too difficult to determine the timing and nature of any event causing contaminat­ion.

IAG’s claims costs for meth contaminat­ion in the past 12 months were $14 million.

Average home decontamin­ation costs were between $20,000 to $25,000, although could be as small as $2000.

Over the past year IAG, across its brands, has received an average of 60 claims every month.

Costs for detailed testing range from $3000 to $10,000.

‘‘We need to be very clear about levels of cover, and that includes establishi­ng a higher excess, so that landlords are encouraged to vet prospectiv­e tenants and monitor their homes rigorously, and that homeowners themselves remain vigilant and take steps to avoid costs associated with contaminat­ion,’’ IAG said.

‘‘It is a societal issue and we are looking at providing more awareness on how to detect the contaminat­ion and its health effects.

‘‘We are saddened to see the effects of methamphet­amine use across our communitie­s, and hope the cycle can be broken.’’

 ?? STACY SQUIRES/FAIRFAX NZ ?? A meth test can cost between $3000 and $10,000.
STACY SQUIRES/FAIRFAX NZ A meth test can cost between $3000 and $10,000.
 ?? SUPPLIED ?? Chemicals and equipment discovered in 2016 during a police raid.
SUPPLIED Chemicals and equipment discovered in 2016 during a police raid.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand