BELEAGUERED
An independent review into the Kiwis’ dismal Rugby League World Cup campaign is highly critical of both the NZRL and national coach David Kidwell. David Long reports.
David Kidwell was too rash in dumping Jesse Bromwich and Kevin Proctor out of the Kiwis’ World Cup squad, the review has found. In the independent review of last year’s disastrous World Cup campaign, carried out by Tim Castle and Raelene Castle, it contained a section on the controversial dumping of Bromwich, who was the Kiwis’ captain, and Proctor.
Both players allegedly took cocaine in the hours after Kiwis were hammered 30-12 by Australia in Canberra following the Anzac test.
The incident came to light the following day on Saturday, May 6 and two days later Kidwell announced they’d both miss the World Cup.
The review found Kidwell rushed his decision, but he should have got better support.
‘‘In our view David Kidwell acted in haste over the Bromwich/ Proctor incident which followed the Anzac test,’’ the report said.
‘‘We acknowledge there is room for debate on that point, but we do think that the lack of leadership at senior management level of NZRL exposed David to intense pressure in the media (therefore publicly) where his handling of the post-Anzac Test player misconduct assumed greater importance than if the proper process to be followed to deal with the players’ misconduct had been implemented.
‘‘David’s very quick decision to outlaw the players from the Kiwis without recourse to proper process seems to have reflected his view that the ‘‘culture’’ of the Kiwis had
been broken. It may have been that after due process the same decision would have been reached, but we now have no way of knowing that and from a public perspective the Kiwis were seen post a disappointing performance in the Anzac Test to be equally in disarray over player behaviour.
‘‘The head coach’s inexperience was starkly evident. It was a very significant setback for the RLWC 17 campaign; and from which it was very difficult for the Kiwis and NZRL to recover.’’
How the Kiwis would have done if Bromwich and Proctor had played in the World Cup will never be known, but they certainly couldn’t have done any worse.
However, Tim Castle said that during his interviews with the players during the review process, this wasn’t something Kidwell could solely blame for the poor World Cup.
‘‘We are critical to the way that incident was handled. We talk about the speed with which the decision was made,’’ he said. ‘‘That wasn’t a David Kidwell-only decision.
‘‘We did canvas that issue with players and as you’d expect from the proposition that they were somehow distracted from the programme.
‘‘It wasn’t easy to deal with in the broader scheme of things, but to make the link between that incident and then what happened at the sharp end of the Rugby League World Cup, was too big a jump.’’
The review is brutal reading and credit needs to be given to the NZRL for not holding back.
It highlights an organisation that was inept in its planning for a tournament which was supposed to revitalise the sport in this country.
‘‘The most disturbing feature for us was the lack of high performance expertise within the organisation, particularly from a planning perspective,’’ Castle said.
‘‘We identified that issue early on and it became not a single focus, but a very important focus in our scrutiny and analysis.
‘‘We made a number of recommendations as to how that could be remedied and that was a part of our approach.
‘‘It wasn’t enough that we could reach conclusions about what was not done well, it was important that we identified how it could be done well in the future.’’
Kidwell comes out of the review as too inexperienced to lead the Kiwis into the World Cup and trying to do too much too soon.
However, Castle commended Kidwell for his openness in the review.
‘‘The most disturbing feature for us was the lack of high performance expertise within the organisation.’’
Tim Castle