Taranaki Daily News

Support for NZF ExCo withdrawn

- Andrew Voerman andrew.voerman@stuff.co.nz Stuff

A second regional federation has withdrawn its support for New Zealand Football’s executive committee, as the fallout from the Muir review continues.

Auckland Football chairman Bob Patterson outlined his board’s position in a letter to executive committee [ExCo] president Philip Barry last Thursday, a copy of which has been obtained by Stuff.

‘‘We do not have confidence in the current membership of the ExCo to lead New Zealand Football through the vital period of change required in the coming months and years,’’ he wrote.

‘‘It is clear that under the leadership of the current ExCo . . . serious failures in judgment were made regarding recruitmen­t and managing a positive working environmen­t for staff and players.’’

Lawyer Phillipa Muir’s review of NZ Football’s conduct and culture was highly critical of ExCo’s performanc­e in recent times.

She found it had ‘‘been too ‘hands off’ in its governance in recent years’’ and that it ‘‘needed to obtain greater reporting from NZ Football management’’. Half of her 22 public recommenda­tions concerned ExCo, which consists of 10 members, elected at the governing body’s annual congresses.

Northern Football was the first federation to withdraw its support for ExCo and call for an extraordin­ary congress, with chairwoman Aimee Barwick outlining her board’s position in a letter to Barry on October 23.

The chairmen of the other six federation­s wrote to Barry the same day, expressing ‘‘a low level of confidence’’ in ExCo, but stopping short of calling for an extraordin­ary congress ‘‘at this stage’’.

Auckland Football has since split from that group, which also included the Waikato-Bay of Plenty, Central, Capital, Mainland and South federation­s.

Patterson did not wish to comment yesterday. In his letter, he said Auckland Football would support holding an extraordin­ary congress, ‘‘to ensure we have a competent and credible ExCo who has a clear mandate to make key appointmen­ts and ensure successful delivery of all recommenda­tions from the review’’. Barry was unfazed, telling

Stuff "the great majority of members have stated clearly they do not want [an extraordin­ary congress]’’. He added that he wasn’t concerned other federation­s might follow Auckland Football in changing their position.

Since the publicatio­n of the Muir review, two ExCo members have resigned – Deryck Shaw, who had been president since April 2015, and Jon Ormond, elected for the first time in May.

Barry was unanimousl­y elected president until next year’s annual congress by ExCo’s eight remaining members, while Johanna Wood was elected vice president for the same period. ExCo has the power to appoint replacemen­ts for Ormond and Shaw but has not yet done so.

New Zealand Football has 11 voting members – the seven regional federation­s, the Profession­al Footballer­s Associatio­n, the Wellington Phoenix, the national men’s league clubs as a collective, and the referees associatio­n. Each federation has two votes, making for a total of 18, which means 10 are required to call an extraordin­ary congress.

Patterson wrote that the Auckland Football board had a ‘‘serious objection’’ to the recruitmen­t process for a new chief executive starting ‘‘under the oversight of the same governing group that were responsibl­e for the previous appointmen­ts that have caused such issues’’. Barry told he had no reservatio­ns about starting that process. He said voting members were made aware in advance about that.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand