Te Awamutu Courier

RSA debates plans for memorial park

Members set out the non-negotiable features they wnat to see retained at park

- Dean Taylor

Te Awamutu RSA president Lou Brown had to take off his Waipa¯ District councillor hat on Sunday when he hosted a gathering at the club to discuss Te Awamutu and District War Memorial Park.

Lou invited club members and members of Te Awamutu Rotary and Lions Clubs to hear what the RSA executive had approved as its submission on council’s Memorial Park proposals.

He said from the beginning of proceeding­s his loyalty had lay with the RSA Club and its members.

Lou had organised the first on-site gathering at the park to investigat­e the extent of the proposals and gauge some of the public feeling.

He said the initial feeling of members was one of horror at the extent of the proposals, and of what would be lost.

They identified what they described as the non-negotiable­s: The archway entrance; the Sunken Cross memorial; the lake and Peace Fountain; the three bridges; and the bass relief.

Lou said each aspect was a carefully thought out part of the overall memorial to the fallen men of World War II, or a commemorat­ion of an important part of the conflict.

As an example, it is now more well known that the three foot bridges each represent one of the armed forces, Army, Navy and Air Force, but it is less well known the Peace Fountain was designed to resemble a nuclear explosion to commemorat­e the end of the conflict in the Pacific brought about by the horrific introducti­on and use of atomic weaponry.

Members of the service clubs had been invited to attend because they had worked with Te Awamutu RSA over the years to enhance park facilities.

This included the constructi­on of the archway entrance in 2002.

The preferred position of RSA is that the non-negotiable­s be restored of rebuilt to a high standard and nonworking facilities such as the Peace Fountain, lake aeration fountains and the flow of the lake, be restored to working condition.

Lou said the park was named in good faith when it was designed and constructe­d in 1955, and it is perfectly fitting.

He said it should be a place for family time — of peace, relaxation and remembranc­e and some of the proposed new features would not be compatible with this.

Murray Olson suggested if there was so much history to the park that was unknown, forgotten or misunderst­ood any project should concentrat­e of undertakin­g the research and making sure that history is recorded on informatio­n boards on-site.

Simultaneo­usly with Te Awamutu RSA presenting its submission on the Te Awamutu and District War Memorial Park proposal to interested parties on Sunday afternoon, Waipa¯ District Council was holding a drop in session for the public on-site.

Reports from that session, and correspond­ence with the editor, would suggest the public do not believe council is paying enough attention to the original intention of the park, and the efforts of those involved in the project.

Council has outlined its Te Wha¯ riki Tuapapa Whakaaro — Foundation of Thought on the ‘have-your-say’ section of its website.

But that isn’t holding much sway with opponents of the proposal who say the original Foundation of Thought was completely appropriat­e at the time, and still is.

Then Te Awamutu mayor Fred Parsons said, “I need hardly comment on the memorial itself. Not many, if any, of our citizens will need to be reminded of its sentimenta­l and emblematic meanings, and few, if any, as the recently issues brochure indicated, will deem it sufficient or worthy to leave only a wooden cross in a distant or alien land as the only tribute to those gallant men who went from this district and who did not return.”

Opponents have expressed concern that important features within the park have been let deteriorat­e, and are now under threat. Their general view is those features should be restored or repaired to new, or better than new (by using modern equipment available) condition.

Submission­s on the current proposals close on Monday, July 13.

In next week’s edition we will look at the history of the project and significan­ce of park features as researched by Marc Dawson.

 ?? Photo / Stirling family collection ?? Newly opened Te Awamutu and District War Memorial Park in the 1950s, well before the extension of Mutu St and bridge to the main road.
Photo / Stirling family collection Newly opened Te Awamutu and District War Memorial Park in the 1950s, well before the extension of Mutu St and bridge to the main road.
 ?? Photo / Robyn Taylor ?? Right: Members of the public took the opportunit­y to attend an informatio­nal day at the Te Awamutu and District War Memorial Park on Sunday.
Photo / Robyn Taylor Right: Members of the public took the opportunit­y to attend an informatio­nal day at the Te Awamutu and District War Memorial Park on Sunday.
 ?? Photo / Stirling family collection ?? ‘New’ Sunken Cross.
Photo / Stirling family collection ‘New’ Sunken Cross.
 ?? Photo / Stirling family collection ?? New Te Awamutu and District War Memorial Park showing fernery, Peace Fountain, playground and curved wall.
Photo / Stirling family collection New Te Awamutu and District War Memorial Park showing fernery, Peace Fountain, playground and curved wall.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand