The New Zealand Herald

More battles in the pipeline

Trump called on to intervene in North Dakota after ruling seen as victory for protesters

- James MacPherson — AP

Industry leaders are urging President-elect Donald Trump to make approval of the disputed Dakota Access oil pipeline a priority when he takes office next month, but a spokesman for Trump isn’t offering many clues about how the incoming president might act.

Meanwhile, the leader of the Standing Rock Sioux is calling on pipeline opponents to leave a camp in southern North Dakota where they’ve been protesting for months, as dangerous winter weather sets in. Many are vowing to stay, however. Here’s a guide to the latest developmen­ts and key background about the protest:

The Trump factor

Two industry groups are calling on Trump to pave the way for the pipeline’s completion when he enters the White House in January. The requests come after the Army declined to issue a permit for the $3.8 billion ($5.3b) pipeline to cross under a Missouri River reservoir in southern North Dakota near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservatio­n.

The American Petroleum Institute represents the United States oil and natural gas industry, and the Main Coalition is made up of agricultur­e, business and labour entities that benefit from Midwest infrastruc­ture projects.

Trump supports constructi­on of the pipeline, spokesman Jason Miller said yesterday, but Miller wouldn’t say whether Trump would reverse the Army’s decision. Miller said the Trump Administra­tion will review the situation “and make the appropriat­e determinat­ion”.

Trump holds stock in Energy Transfer Partners, the Dallas-based company building the pipeline. Pipeline opponents worry that Trump’s investment­s could affect any decision he makes on the project as president.

Easement denial

The Army on Monday said it would not approve an easement for a pipeline crossing beneath Lake Oahe, a Missouri River reservoir and the source of drinking water for the nearby Standing Rock Reservatio­n. The Standing Rock tribe says the pipeline threatens its water and cultural sites.

Assistant Army Secretary for Civil Works Jo-Ellen Darcy said her decision was based on the need to consider alternativ­e routes.

Energy Transfer Partners said the decision is politicall­y motivated and that President Barack Obama’s Administra­tion is just delaying the matter until he leaves office.

Protesters, who describe themselves as “water protectors”, say they have no plans to leave despite the Army’s decision and recent wintry storms.

Standing Rock chairman Dave Archambaul­t said yesterday that he doesn’t think there will be any developmen­ts for months and that people should go home.

The origins

Energy Transfer Partners got federal permits for the pipeline in July, about two years after it was announced. The pipeline is projected to move a halfmillio­n barrels of crude oil daily to an existing pipeline in Patoka, Illinois, for shipment to Midwest and Gulf Coast markets.

Supporters say the pipeline will have safeguards against leaks, and is a safer way to move oil than trucks and trains, especially after a handful of fiery — and sometimes deadly — derailment­s of trains carrying North Dakota crude.

The Standing Rock Sioux, whose reservatio­n straddles the North Dakota-South Dakota border, have challenged the Army Corps of Engineers’ decision to grant permits at more than 200 water crossings. A federal judge in September denied the tribe’s request to block constructi­on of the entire pipeline.

Missing link

The pipeline is largely complete except for the section under Lake Oahe, about 1.6km upstream of the reservatio­n.

The tribe argues putting the pipeline there could affect drinking water for more than 8000 tribal members and millions downstream. The Corps of Engineers granted Energy Transfer Partners the permits needed for the crossing in July, but the federal Government decided in September that further analysis was warranted given the tribe’s concerns. Then came Monday’s decision from the Army, which oversees the Corps.

The company responded by asking US District Judge James Boasberg to declare that it has the right to lay pipe under Lake Oahe. The judge isn’t likely to issue a decision until January at the earliest.

Obama raised the possibilit­y of rerouting the pipeline in early November, and Archambaul­t has said that would be acceptable to the tribe provided the new route isn’t near the reservatio­n and doesn’t cross the Missouri River. But Energy Transfer Partners CEO Kelcy Warren told the Associated Press that that the pipeline won’t be rerouted and the company has no alternativ­e than to stick to its plan.

 ?? Picture / AP ?? Veterans have joined the anti-pipeline protests in Cannon Ball, North Dakota, where winter is setting in.
Picture / AP Veterans have joined the anti-pipeline protests in Cannon Ball, North Dakota, where winter is setting in.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand