The New Zealand Herald

Little’s immigratio­n ale plan holds a few flaws

- Claire Trevett comment

Labour leader Andrew Little has finally found the cure for all that ails us in relation to the rights of New Zealanders in Australia. It is a problem that has vexed successive Government­s since John Howard clamped down on social security entitlemen­ts and citizenshi­p rights of New Zealanders in 2001.

Little’s solution does not involve any witchcraft — no toe of newt or hair of shrew. All that is apparently involved are a couple of beers and a sun-baked balcony (or air-conditione­d room) at Kirribilli House — the Australian Prime Minister’s Sydney residence.

Little offered this in response to news Australia was making permanent residents wait for four years to apply for citizenshi­p — up from one year now.

That was a year after Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull announced a special path to citizenshi­p for about 100,000 of the 305,000 Kiwis who moved to Australia between 2001 and 2016 who earned more than $57,000 a year.

Little described the latest move as a watering down of Turnbull’s promise to his mate John Key. “I’m pretty sure if Bill Shorten and I had a beer at Kirribilli House we’d get it sorted out pretty smartly,” he said on TVNZ’s Breakfast yesterday.

There are two pre-conditions to this solution. First, Little has to win this year’s election. Then Shorten has to win the Australian election in 2018/19.

There is some irony here, for one of the mechanisms by which Little hopes to achieve the former is by campaignin­g on a promise of drastic cuts in immigratio­n.

It is a bit rich when you are cutting your own immigratio­n levels to expect your neighbour to exempt you on their cuts.

Meanwhile Australia Labor MPs have called Turnbull out for dog whistling and xenophobia for his proposals aimed at cutting immigratio­n.

Everybody loves a trier, but Little could be disappoint­ed in his expectatio­ns of what a future Australian Labor Government might deliver.

It was former Liberal PM John Howard who took away social security rights for New Zealanders in 2001 — as well as an easy path to citizenshi­p. Since then, Key managed to eke more out of the Turnbull Government than either he or Helen Clark did out of Labor Party Government­s led by Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard.

Nor could Little have taken much encouragem­ent out of Shorten’s initial reaction to Turnbull’s proposal. The only

I’m pretty sure if Bill Shorten and I had a beer at Kirribilli House we’d get it sorted out pretty smartly. Andrew Little

aspect of Turnbull’s reforms that Shorten has so far voiced any support for was the longer period to wait for citizenshi­p — the very same aspect that concerns Kiwis.

Little’s immigratio­n policy is closer to Turnbull’s than Shorten’s.

By way of achieving his goal, Turnbull has proposed cutting one of the visa categories altogether to free up more jobs for Australian­s, making people take stricter language and “values” testing and imposing a four-year wait for permanent residents to get citizenshi­p rather than a one-year wait. His driving force is “Australian values” — although he is yet to decide what questions will elicit whether hopeful citizens hold sufficient Australian values to pass muster.

Little is yet to set out the specifics of what he will do to achieve his goal of cutting net migration from its record highs of 72,000. He has not said how much he wants to cut.

We know that 72,000 is too high, and Little has been heard to hanker for the good old days when it was around 25,000 — but he’s denied that means he wants to cut it by 50,000. He has settled on saying “tens of thousands”.

Little is hoping to get the cuts he needs while keeping intact New Zealand’s humanitari­an settings — a quota for the Pacific, a lift in the refugee quota and the family reunificat­ion policy. Presumably he does not want the internatio­nal students sector to be too hard hit either.

Little has pitched his plan as one to better align migrants with the skills New Zealand needs rather than taking any old Tom, Dick and Harry.

And it could well be the Toms, Dicks and Harrys who are affected.

Ask any local MP and they will tell you the issue British migrants most often raise with them is immigratio­n — of others.

Despite the tendency of some politician­s (hello Winston! and occasional­ly Little himself) to focus on groups such as Indian chefs and Chinese instead, the British have long been one of the biggest groups to come to New Zealand to work and settle long term.

Oh. And Australian­s.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand