Trump’s probe plea to spy chiefs

President tried to get top intelligence to push back against an FBI investigation on Russia, say sources

President Donald Trump asked two of the nation’s top intelligence officials in March to help him push back against an FBI investigation into possible co-ordination between his campaign and the Russian Government, according to current and former officials.

Trump made separate appeals to the director of national intelligence, Daniel Coats, and to Admiral Michael Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency, urging them to publicly deny the existence of any evidence of collusion during last year’s election.

Coats and Rogers refused to comply with the requests, which they both deemed to be inappropriate, according to two current and two former officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private communications with the President.

Trump sought the assistance of Coats and Rogers after then-FBI director James Comey told the House Intelligence Committee on March 20 that the FBI was investigating “the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian Government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts”.

Trump’s conversation with Rogers was documented contemporaneously in an internal memo written by a senior NSA official, according to the officials.

It is unclear if a similar memo was prepared by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to document Trump’s conversation with Coats. Officials said such memos could be made available to both the special counsel now overseeing the Russia investigation and congressional investigators, who might explore whether Trump sought to impede the FBI’s work.

White House officials say Comey’s testimony about the scope of the FBI investigation upset Trump, who has dismissed the FBI and congressional investigations as a “witch hunt”. The President has repeatedly said there was no collusion.

Current and former senior intelligence officials viewed Trump’s requests as an attempt by the President to tarnish the credibility of the agency leading the Russia investigation.

A senior intelligence official said Donald Trump’s first overseas trip as President was seen by the White House as an opportunity to move the focus from the growing controversies at home. Yesterday in Jerusalem he visited the Western Wall with (from left) Shmuel Rabinovitch, Rabbi of the Western Wall, and Mordechai “Suli” Elias, director general of the Western Wall Heritage Foundation. He was to also visit the West Bank before heading to Europe. that Trump’s goal was to “muddy the waters” about the scope of the FBI probe at a time when Democrats were ramping up their calls for the Justice Department to appoint a special counsel, a step announced last week.

Senior intelligence officials also saw the March requests as a threat to the independence of US spy agencies, which are supposed to remain insulated from partisan issues.

“The problem wasn’t so much asking them to issue statements, it was asking them to issue false statements about an ongoing investigation,” a former senior intelligence official said of the request to Coats.

The NSA and Brian Hale, a spokesman for Coats, declined to comment, citing the ongoing investigation.

“The White House does not confirm or deny unsubstantiated claims based on illegal leaks from anonymous individuals,” a White House spokesperson said.

In addition to the requests to Coats and Rogers, senior White House officials sounded out top intelligence officials about the possibility of intervening directly with Comey to encourage the FBI to drop its probe of Michael Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser, according to people familiar with the matter. The officials said the White House appeared uncertain about its power to influence the FBI.

“Can we ask him to shut down the investigation? Are you able to assist in this matter?” one official said of the line of questioning from the White House.

The new revelations add to a growing body of evidence that Trump sought to co-opt and then undermine Comey before he fired him on May 10. According to notes kept by Comey, Trump asked for his loyalty at a dinner in January and then, at a meeting the next month, asked him to drop the probe into Flynn. Trump disputes those accounts.

Current and former officials said either Trump lacks an understanding of the FBI’s role as an independent law enforcement agency or does not care about maintaining such boundaries.

Trump’s effort to use the director of national intelligence and the NSA director to refute Comey’s statement and to say there was no evidence of collusion echoes President Richard Nixon’s “unsuccessful efforts to use the CIA to shut down the FBI’s investigation of the Watergate break-in on national security grounds”, said Jeffrey H. Smith, a former general counsel at the CIA. Smith called Trump’s actions “an appalling abuse of power”.

Trump made his appeal to Coats days after Comey’s testimony, according to officials and just days after Coats was sworn in.

That same week, Trump telephoned Rogers to make a similar appeal.

In his call with Rogers, Trump urged the NSA director to speak out publicly if there was no evidence of collusion, according to officials briefed on the exchange.

Rogers was taken aback but tried to respectfully explain why he could not do so, the officials said. For one thing, he could not comment on an ongoing investigation. Rogers added that he would not talk about classified matters in public.

As the director of national intelligence, Coats leads the vast US intelligence community, which includes the FBI. But that does not mean he has full visibility into the FBI probe.

Coats’s predecessor in the job, James Clapper, recently acknowledged that Comey did not brief him on the scope of the Russia investigation.

Similarly, it is unclear to what extent the FBI has brought Coats up to speed on the probe’s most sensitive findings.