The New Zealand Herald

Landlords hide P homes

Exclusive Some keeping contaminat­ion off council file to protect property values

- Kirsty Johnston

Some landlords with methcontam­inated houses are avoiding telling local authoritie­s to ensure their houses don’t lose value. The investors say having the informatio­n on their property’s council file — even if the chemical residue is later removed — carries stigma, and will put buyers off. While the behaviour is not illegal, one home-owner's associatio­n said it was “unscrupulo­us to say the least” not to report contaminat­ion, as that meant any future owners or tenants were denied access to the property’s full history.

“I think a lot of landlords are scurrying around trying to keep things under the radar because they don't want to spend the money to properly remediate a contaminat­ed home,” said Home Owners and Buyers Associatio­n (Hobanz) president John Gray.

“But there’s a line that has to be drawn somewhere.”

The Herald first found evidence of the trend in online property investors’ forums, where owners were discussing how to get the council to help evict tenants without the contaminat­ion going on a Land Informatio­n Memorandum (Lim) report.

Hobanz and Auckland Council confirmed they were aware of the behaviour.

Auckland Council’s regional en- vironmenta­l control manager Marcus Herrmann said people avoided reporting contaminat­ion for a variety of reasons, including uncertaint­y about remediatio­n requiremen­ts, and the effect on their profits.

“They believe the stigma attached to having the informatio­n on their property file will affect the value of their home,” he said.

Herrmann said while there was no legal obligation, it was appropriat­e for landlords to inform the council to ensure health and safety of tenants and prospectiv­e owners. Methamphet­amine is considered a health risk.

If a house has been a lab, police usually inform the council which then undertakes testing. However, health authoritie­s or private owners who become aware of contaminat­ion are also expected to pass on any informatio­n.

When residue is present, councils usually place a note on the Lim if the levels exceed health guidelines — currently set between 0.5mcg to 1.5mcg per 100 square cm depending whether the house was a site for manufactur­e or use, respective­ly.

Councils update that informatio­n when the issue is remediated by a

qualified company. While there is no health risk once a property is remediated, Property Investors Federation executive officer Andrew King said he believed having the informatio­n on a LIM report would still devalue a property.

“At the moment there’s a bit of hysteria around it. There’s such publicity that I think people have an irrational fear of meth.”

King said he did not think owners should have to report methamphet­amine contaminat­ion to the council.

“If you do a test and it’s over the limit, and then clean it, there’s no way it’s going to have an effect on anyone living there.”

First National Real Estate chief executive Bob Brereton said contaminat­ion — even if remediated — could drop a sale price up to 5 per cent.

“In the same way a leaky home has a stigma attached, contaminat­ed houses have a negative public perception,” Brereton said.

“They take longer to sell and are harder to tenant. It’s a simple reality.”

Real estate agents are bound to inform potential buyers when they know a house is contaminat­ed.

Labour housing spokesman Phil Twyford said both landlords and tenants were in a lose-lose situation, and the Government’s failure to pro- vide testing standards had been part of the problem.

Currently, the rules on contaminat­ion are simply guidelines, but are due to become enforceabl­e “standards” later this month.

“We have to hope those will help,” Twyford said.

“People deserve to know the history of their property. There should be testing that can guarantee a property has been properly remediated.”

When asked for comment on the issue, Minister for Building and Housing Nick Smith pointed to the Residentia­l Tenancies Amendment Bill (No 2), currently before Parliament.

The Bill does not have provisions about reporting, but will make the new standards enforceabl­e by law.

It will also help ensure tenancy laws better manage methamphet­amine contaminat­ion, liability for careless damage and the tenancy of unsuitable properties.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand