The New Zealand Herald

Britain to put $63.5b on table for Brexit divorce

UK hopes to get talks moving on deal with EU on future relations, including trade

- Peter Foster

Britain is prepared to pay up to 40 billion ($63.5b) to the EU to settle the so-called Brexit divorce bill. Senior Whitehall officials have concluded that such an offer — the first time a precise figure has been proposed — is the only way to break the deadlock in negotiatio­ns.

The UK will only agree to pay the

40b if the EU negotiates the financial settlement as part of a deal on future relations, including a trade deal. Three separate sources in Whitehall and government with knowledge of the UK’s negotiatin­g strategy confirmed the figure.

British Brexit negotiator­s concluded after second-round talks last month that the EU had created an impossible straitjack­et for the negotiatio­n process by refusing to talk about trade until it had reached a settlement on citizens’ rights, money and Northern Ireland. To break the impasse, senior Whitehall officials are now looking to propose a transition deal in which Britain would offer to make net payments to the EU of some 10b a year for up to three years after Brexit. The continued EU budget payments for 2019-2021 would not resolve all the arguments over the Brexit bill, but represent a partial downpaymen­t on a final 40b bill that negotiator­s hope will jump-start talks on trade and future relations.

British Government negotiator­s have been able to ascertain that the EU’s actual opening position is around €60b.

“The 27 member states say they can’t knock off bits of their ‘bill’ until the very end but politicall­y we can’t move on money until the 27 start to show compromise. As a negotiatio­n process, it just doesn’t work,” said a senior Whitehall source.

“We know their position is 60b, but the actual bottom line is 50b. Ours is closer to 30b, but the landing zone is

40b, even if the public and politician­s are not all there yet,” the source added. A second Whitehall source confirmed the British bottom line was “€30b to

40b”, while a third source said the figure in Prime Minister Theresa May’s mind was “north of £30b”. Making such a large offer is likely to prove politicall­y divisive for the Prime Minister. Ardent

Brexiteers will find it hard to accept paying such a sum — and certainly if it is not in exchange for a workable future relationsh­ip.

Just three weeks ago, Boris Johnson, the Foreign Secretary, told MPs in the House of Commons that European leaders could “go whistle” if they expected Britain to pay an “exorbitant” divorce bill for withdrawin­g from the European Union.

British negotiator­s are pessimisti­c about the chances of a breakthrou­gh at the next round of talks, which open on August 28. The stand-off last month led Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator, to warn last month that it was now “very unlikely” that talks can progress in October as planned unless there is significan­t movement.

A series of position papers setting out Britain’s approach to Brexit on a new customs agreement and a solution to the Irish border issue could start to be published as soon as next week to give the talks some momentum. Downing Street advisers have privately warned City bosses that a British walkout from the talks is a real possibilit­y if the impasse cannot be broken.

At the heart of the dispute is the EU’s demand that the UK agree a “methodolog­y” on the bill before moving on to trade talks — but British ministers are adamant this is tantamount to agreeing a final bill and they cannot sign cheques except as part of a final deal.

Barnier and the European Commission say the EU negotiatin­g mandate means they cannot shift from their position, but some EU capitals have privately indicated that they want to see the talks move forward in October. Breaking the deadlock would require a formal declaratio­n from the UK that it wanted to request a transition deal of two to three years, in which it would pay full budget contributi­ons in return for access to the single market for a fixed period after Brexit. British officials and EU experts argue that the UK paying full contributi­ons for up to three years could open the door to trade talks by removing the short-term budget problems caused by Brexit. Philip Hammond, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, has been lobbying Cabinet for just such a “stand-still” agreement, which the EU insists will also require the UK to accept continued free movement of people and the ongoing observance of all EU rules and regulation­s. EU officials insist, and UK sources concede, that a transition deal will not settle the bill issue. It would not satisfy EU demands to resolve pension liabilitie­s for EU staff, the UK’s share of liabilitie­s to outstandin­g loans to Ukraine, Romania and Ireland, and past commitment­s to other EU projects outside the annual budget.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand