The New Zealand Herald

Mum loses latest family carer court challenge

- — Kirsty Johnston

A mum caring for her disabled adult son has lost her court case against the Government and will not be paid for all her work.

Diane Moody, who cares full time for her son Shane Chamberlai­n, 50, took the Ministry of Health to court after they decided she could only receive payment up to 21 hours a week, on minimum wage.

Shane is profoundly intellectu­ally disabled and also has Williams syndrome. Moody is 75 years old and has always cared for Shane at home. While Moody argued her work takes up 168 hours a week, officials said their Funded Family Care policy only paid for “personal care” and “household management”, not supervisio­n.

Moody argued in the High Court at Auckland the policy was unreasonab­le. She also said measuring Shane’s needs in terms of time was “inconsiste­nt with his dignity”.

However, the court ruled this week the Ministry was acting within the law. “Although I can understand why Mrs Moody was surprised, I conclude the Ministry’s decisions are, legally, within the terms of the Funded Fam- ily Care Policy,” Justice Palmer said.

The Government has strongly argued against paying family carers, saying looking after the disabled was a “social contract”. It will pay for someone else to come and do the job.

In 2010, some families decided to challenge the policy at the Human Rights Tribunal, arguing discrimina­tion. While they won that case, it was twice appealed and twice lost.

In response, the Government passed the Health and Disability Amendment Bill under urgency in 2013. It allowed for some family members to be paid, but also sought to stop further legal challenges to the policy, which at least one lawyer argued was a breach of constituti­onal law. Under the policy, family carers — but not spouses — would be paid minimum wage for up to 40 hours a week.

At least two individual­s have mounted challenges to the carer policy — Margaret Spencer, who eventually won $200,000 compensati­on, and Diane Moody, whose case is the subject of the current decision.

Moody’s lawyers indicated they would appeal.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand