The New Zealand Herald

TV review

- Continued from A36

(they were funded as a pair way back in 2012). That is, it starts off with a depiction of New Zealand as an idyll, where Bruce’s parents and he could buy a house with a government­backed mortgage for twice their annual salary.

Then: disaster! Reagan and Thatcher and Douglas and neoliberal­ism.

This history lesson is not without merit — it’s useful for people to know how much easier it was to buy into housing for prior generation­s. But the framing of this era as an idyll is inescapabl­y a Pakeha one: he talks about the descent from a homeowners­hip rate of 74 per cent then to 64 per cent today, without ever acknowledg­ing that at the same peak, the rate was under 60 per cent for Maori and 50 per cent for Pacific people. Like so many good-old-days narratives, he fails to acknowledg­e that the old days were particular­ly good for a specific type of person.

The fixation on neoliberal­ism is hardly unique to Bruce, but it does seem a form of stylistic throatclea­ring. It helps cement the point that this is ultimately an intensely Winstonian world view: pining for days of statist control and viewing Asian money with deep suspicion.

Having relived the 80s we head off overseas. There’s Ireland, where we see the after-effects of a constructi­on boom — plummeting prices, an odd thing to fret about in this context.

There’s Turin, where we visit a leafy apartment building where units go for $1 million-plus — but they had to wait three years for resource consent (I’m not sure what the point is either).

Mostly, there’s Canada. That’s where we meet the guy talking about a trillion Chinese dollars at the start — an associate professor at the mid- ranking Simon Fraser University. After this mission, Bruce feels confident enough to issue a verdict.

“There is that sense in New Zealand that we don’t want to upset the Chinese — and that talking about Chinese money raises racial issues.”

Quite. That is why Labour was so castigated for it a couple of years back. Yet it’s the most persistent thread throughout the documentar­y, and overwhelms what is worthwhile about it — most notably its segment on rental protection and communal flat ownership in Germany.

Yet such internatio­nal solutions to our housing issues are forgone in favour of race-baiting and a Bruce family history.

That self-involvemen­t is understand­able. Who Owns New Zealand Now? was written, directed, produced and line-edited by one man: Bryan Bruce — whose production company Red Sky has been NZ on Air-funded 18 times in 18 years, totalling just shy of $4.5m.

Among those have been titles of merit — but this is not one of them. Instead it’s an indulgent, cheaply made and presented travelogue with undertones of old-fashioned nostalgia and scaremonge­ring. It should not have been made.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand