The New Zealand Herald

Thor hit and myth with Norse legends

- Sylvie Magerstaed­t Sylvie Magerstaed­t is Principal Lecturer in Media Cultures, University of Hertfordsh­ire.

Even before its release in the US market, Thor: Ragnarok, the final instalment in the Marvel trilogy featuring the Norse God of Thunder, topped the internatio­nal box office with US$107.6m ($157m) and earned more money for an October release in Britain for any movie other than a James Bond film.

But beyond being a dose of actionpack­ed entertainm­ent, the film raises a number of questions on how ancient myths are incorporat­ed into contempora­ry superhero franchises. Thor: Ragnarok’s mix of Nordic myth, apocalypti­c visions and science fiction fantasies makes it hugely entertaini­ng but also problemati­c where the use of myth is concerned.

Thor is of course not the only superhero blending ancient myth and comic book characters. Earlier this year, the new Wonder Woman movie gave us a demigoddes­s drawn from a range of classical sources.

It is undeniable that modern superheroe­s and the gods and heroes of mythology have a lot in common. Apart from superhuman powers, they also live by their own moral codes — often outside of human society. When adapted into a comic universe, new rules apply. The focus shifts from largely self-interested desires towards the protection of mankind as a central aim.

Thor, however, is a particular­ly interestin­g case as he is drawn from Norse rather than Greek mythology. Unlike Greek mythology, Norse myths are generally much less well-known. This might make their appropriat­ion easier as fewer people are likely to bemoan potential inaccuraci­es — but also means that you cannot draw on the audience’s background knowledge in the same way.

In this latest instalment, Thor faces his evil sister Hela (a variation on the goddess Hel) played by Cate Blanchett, who has taken over Asgard — the mythical home of the Norse gods (at least in this simplified version). He fears that she will bring about Ragnarok, the “Twilight of the Gods”. Yet, in the end, it is he who causes rather than prevents it, to destroy the evil villainess and protect his people.

Pick’n’mix mythology

The mixing up of different mythic realms is many centuries old — 13th-century Icelandic historian Snorri Sturluson, who is the source of much of Norse mythology, conflated Asgard with the mythic city of Troy.

Although he later revised this, in Sturluson’s earlier Prose Edda, Thor is the son of Troan, daughter of the Trojan king Priam. This might partly explain his reincarnat­ion as a gladiator halfway through the film, his new look more akin to Spartacus and the like than his previous longhaired, Viking-inspired appearance.

Sturluson also wrote at a time when Christiani­ty gradually took over as the dominant religion and, as such, his recounting of the old Norse myths is diffused with Christian undertones.

Hints at this replacemen­t of the old myths by a Christian world order can also be found in Thor: Ragnarok. When Hela first returns to Asgard, she destroys a ceiling painting that depicts the Norse gods in a distinctly Christian manner, complete with golden halos. Hela blasts the ceiling away, revealing the images of a much darker past, where Odin is shown as brutal conqueror rather than benevolent ruler. However, despite the epic title, very little of the film deals with this battle of the gods. While in the myth the whole world goes up in flames, the film contains its

destructio­n to Asgard. In contradict­ion with myth, first Odin then Thor claim that “Asgard is not a place, it’s a people”.

Tongue-in-cheek Thor?

While myths have always been adapted to make sense of contempora­ry issues, limiting these to a particular place and a small group of people somewhat jeopardise­s their universali­ty. Moreover, the modern superhero genre generates mythic heroes that are no longer part of a specific mythic realm. The films are, of course, always linked to other parts of the Marvel Superheroe­s franchise.

But first and foremost, superheroe­s and heroines are just individual­s that battle their own issues — and mythology is used merely as a back story rather than a guiding principle for the film’s narrative. In the end, everything is smothered in irony, robbing the mythical elements of their meaning.

Don’t get me wrong, it’s funny and nostalgic, in particular the nods to 1980s and 1990s film and television. The tongue-in-cheek approach and the antipodean sets all reminded me of Hercules: The Legendary Journeys (1995-1999), which incidental­ly also dealt with Ragnarok in its fifth season. The difference is that for Hercules, human beings were always central, and he was happy to let the gods destroy each other if needed.

While Thor also ultimately saves the people of Asgard, the main focus is on the battle between him and Hela. In these battles between superhuman beings, ordinary people often end up as collateral damage. — which rather challenges the notion of superheroe­s as the protectors of humankind.

Another Marvel film, Captain America: Civil War raised this central ethical question: is it ever justified to sacrifice human beings for the greater good? I’m not sure I can find similar significan­t issues being explored in Thor: Ragnarok. Or maybe the filmmakers have simply shied away from giving us a clear moral message in the way Hercules used to do. Decide for yourself and enjoy the ride.

hints at the eclipsing of Norse myths by Christiani­ty that was taking place in the 13th century.

 ??  ??
 ?? Picture / Jasin Boland ?? Thor’s shorthaire­d, gladiatori­al look in Thor: Ragnarok
Picture / Jasin Boland Thor’s shorthaire­d, gladiatori­al look in Thor: Ragnarok
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand