The New Zealand Herald

Rings on TV a ‘terrible’ idea

They’re after the next Game of Thrones, but dragons won’t cut it

- Karl Puschmann @critikarl

This week Amazon displayed a wondrously barren sense of imaginatio­n by announcing they’re making a brand new Lord of the Rings telly series for their upstart streaming platform Amazon Prime.

Lord of the Rings? Really? Dear God. Who in Frodo’s name wants that? Thanks to Sir Pete’s exhaustive and butt-numbing series of films, I reckon I’ve seen enough hobbits, orcs, goblins and elves to tide me over for at least another decade. Possibly longer.

Heck, I’m still fatigued from battling my way to the end of his three Hobbit films. The thought of going anywhere near there and back again over four or five seasons of television fills me with, at best, indifferen­t boredom and, at worst, weary dread. At this point I feel like I couriered that bloody ring to Mordor myself.

This televisual adaptation, Amazon’s official blurb explained, will “explore new storylines preceding J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Fellowship of the Ring”.

Translatio­n: It’s a prequel, exactly like The Hobbit. But they’re also saying “new storylines”, ruling out Bilbo’s fun-filled jaunt to the Lonely Mountain and his discovery of the ring.

It’s not clear if these new storylines are going to be lifted from the voluminous tomes detailing the longwinded and complete history of Middle Earth that Tolkien penned or if Amazon is just gonna go ahead and make them up. But neither option appeals much.

The only thing that Sir Pete’s madeup bits added to The Hobbit was time. And there’s a very boring reason why only Tolkien diehards enthuse over the writer’s painstakin­gly detailed, nerdishly encyclopae­dic history of his made-up world . . .

While Amazon hasn’t revealed if the series will keep the look and feel of Sir Pete’s movies, they did gush that there might even be “a potential spinoff series”. Yay?

Look, I get it. With Game of Thrones rapidly approachin­g its fiery and/or icy conclusion, everyone’s franticall­y

looking for the “next Game of Thrones”.

It’s almost like they’ve forgotten that the next Game of Thrones is most likely to be Game of Thrones. Right now there are five — yes, five! — GoT spin-offs in developmen­t. They won’t all go into production, of course, but we’re not going to be wanting for songs of fire and ice.

So when it comes to fanciful fantasy we’re pretty much covered. Giving us more of the same, no matter how recognisab­le the source material

Instead it’s back to tired old Middle Earth to trudge through more of the same.

may be, is not the way to become the next big thing. I reckon that the next Game of

Thrones — meaning show that captures the whole world’s imaginatio­n — won’t have anything to do with dragons and swords because we’ve literally just seen it. No, the next

Game of Thrones will be something completely different because that’s how bottled lightning tends to work.

But if Amazon are 100 per cent the fantasy boom is set to continue, they could at least have dug out something original. I haven’t read that much fantasy but I can think of at least two other fantasy series that would make amazing television.

Robert E. Feist’s Magician books would make for a rip-snortingly good TV series. He takes the traditiona­l fantasy world and spins it on its head by introducin­g a race of alien invaders. It’s got great characters, a fast pace, thrilling battles and an original and exciting story that eventually spans two distinct worlds.

But a true Game of Thrones killer would be The Darkness series by Harry Turtledove. You want an epic story packed with political intrigue, well-rounded characters and about a dozen overlappin­g storylines? Well, here you go.

This phenomenal story — told over six bulky novels — is essentiall­y a fantasy reskinning of World War II. Covering continents, the story follows a huge range of characters on all sides of the conflict, from the lowliest frontline grunts right through to the unaffected darlings of high society.

There’s spies, soldiers, flying aces, generals, leaders, kings, conspirato­rs, resistance fighters, scientists, politician­s, everyday people . . . everyone. Not for nothing does each book open with a five-page Cast of Characters to assist in keeping track of where everyone fits.

It’s heavy going but at least there’s no waiting for winter or an endless walk to a mountain. Instead, it’s on from the get go, riffing on WWII’s biggest events, fiercest battles, and even the horrors of the Holocaust.

But being fantasy it does cool things like swapping fighter planes for dragons and equipping wizards with magic of mass destructio­n. Battles with all this going on would be visually amazing and its high-stakes story would be dramatical­ly intense.

But no. Instead it’s back to tired old Middle Earth to trudge through more of the same. There’s been a lot of

LOTR so forgive me if I’m not terribly excited. I guess I’m just bored of the rings.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Bored of the rings — another journey to Middle Earth after the butt-numbing Hobbit trilogy is a recipe for dread.
Bored of the rings — another journey to Middle Earth after the butt-numbing Hobbit trilogy is a recipe for dread.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand