The New Zealand Herald

Infrastruc­ture, expertise needed for biological weapons

- — Washington Post

officers, appeared almost gleeful in showing them off, striking the same rapt pose as when he visits the country’s installati­ons for nuclear weapons and long-range missiles.

“It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the institute is intended to produce military-size batches of anthrax,” Melissa Hanham, a North Korea specialist at the James Martin Centre for Nonprolife­ration Studies in Monterey, California, wrote in a blog posting after the video was shown.

US analysts now believe the timing of the visit was deliberate: The previous week, on May 28, the Pentagon had publicly acknowledg­ed that live samples of US-made anthrax bacteria had been accidental­ly shipped to a South Korean military base because of a lab mix-up. North Korea lodged a formal complaint with the United Nations on June 4, calling the incident proof of American “biological warfare schemes” against its citizens.

Kim’s trip to the biotechnol­ogy institute came just two days later, and was clearly intended to send a message, Hanham said in an interview.

Some weapons experts were sceptical, noting the absence of biohazard suits and protective gear found in laboratori­es that work with deadly pathogens. But since the release of the images, subsequent examinatio­ns have poked holes in the official story about the factory’s purpose. For one thing, some of the machines shown were not visibly connected to any pipes, vents or ductwork.

Experts also have questioned why North Korea would buy expensive industrial equipment at black-market rates, just to make a pesticide that can be purchased legally, at vastly cheaper rates, from China.

“The real takeaway is that [North Korea] had the dual-use equipment necessary for bioweapons production,” said Andrew Weber, a former Assistant Secretary of Defence for nuclear, chemical and biological defence programmes. “What the photos show is a modern bioproduct­ion capability.”

That North Korea possesses the basic components for biological weapons is all but settled doctrine within US and Asian military and intelligen­ce establishm­ents, and has been for years.

Although overshadow­ed by Pyongyang’s nuclear and chemical weapons, the threat of biological attack from the North is regarded as sufficient­ly serious that the Pentagon routinely vaccinates all Korea-bound troops for exposure to anthrax and smallpox.

But determinin­g North Korea’s precise capabiliti­es — and the regime’s intentions for using such weapons — have been among the toughest intelligen­ce challenges for US analysts.

Questions about North Korea’s capability have taken on a new urgency, as military planners prepare for the possibilit­y that tensions with Pyongyang could lead to war.

While US and South Korean aircraft would seek to knock out suspected chemical and biological facilities from the air, the newest plans include a presumptio­n that infantry divisions would have to face an array of chemical and biological hazards on the battlefiel­d — hazards that may be invisible to fast-moving ground troops, current and former US officials say.

A consensus view among military planners is that Kim is choosing to hold his bioweapons card in reserve for now, while his scientists build up a capacity to manufactur­e large quantities of pathogens quickly.

Joseph DeTrani, a retired CIA veteran who oversaw intelligen­ce collection for North Korea in the 2000s, noted that ambiguity has been a builtin feature of North Korean weapons programmes for decades.

“They talk openly about their ‘nuclear deterrent,’ but with chemical and biological weapons, it’s different,” DeTrani said. “They’ve always played it close to the vest. For them, it’s a real option. But they want to preserve the possibilit­y of deniabilit­y.”

 ?? Picture / AP ?? Kim Jong Un has been locked in a war of words with the West.
Picture / AP Kim Jong Un has been locked in a war of words with the West.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand