The New Zealand Herald

Here’s to a merry tax deductible festive season

They’re part of doing business — so what do you say, Jacinda?

-

The silly season is upon us. It’s that time of the year when businesses thank their clients, customers and/or staff with a party. In my view, this expenditur­e is a completely normal business expense. It’s all part of being a good supplier and employer, and also generates goodwill. It shows them they’re appreciate­d.

Unfortunat­ely the Government doesn’t share this spirit of goodwill. And it has legislated that this ordinary business expenditur­e is not fully tax deductible. This begs the question; why is this legitimate entertainm­ent provided by taxpayers not fully deductible? Why is the tax deduction generally limited to 50 per cent?

Promoting your business by entertaini­ng customers to increase a business’s revenue and profitabil­ity just makes good business sense. It’s not private expenditur­e. And, private expenditur­e would not be tax deductible anyway.

There’s also a significan­t compliance cost to the taxpayer who has to analyse the type of entertainm­ent expenditur­e it has incurred. They must decide what is fully tax deductible, and what is not. Often there is uncertaint­y whether expenditur­e is fully tax deductible.

In a number of cases, businesses throw their hands in the air and say,

Businesses should be able to legitimate­ly claim expenditur­e that is tax deductible to them without effort. After all businesses are unpaid tax collectors for the Government

“I have better things to do than put resources into analysing expenditur­e. So I will treat all expenditur­e as not being fully deductible.”

This is not satisfacto­ry, in my view, as businesses should be able to legitimate­ly claim expenditur­e that is tax deductible to them without effort. After all, businesses are unpaid tax collectors for the Government for taxes such as PAYE and GST.

A simple solution could be allowing entertainm­ent expenditur­e under a reasonable threshold to be tax deductible. This would likely reduce compliance costs to most businesses not close to this threshold.

This principle applies already with legal fees, where legislatio­n provides that legal fees of up to $10,000 a year or under are tax deductible in full, and do not need to be analysed as to whether they are deductible and not deductible expenditur­e.

For entertainm­ent, a similar threshold could apply of $10,000, or say 1/10 of 1 per cent (0.001 per cent) of turnover, whichever is greater.

So, a business with a turnover of $20 million could claim up to $20,000 of entertainm­ent expenditur­e for tax purposes, without detailed analysis.

Smaller businesses will not have major entertainm­ent expenditur­e and a threshold of $10,000 in most cases would mean they can eliminate the compliance cost of analysing entertainm­ent expenditur­e altogether, and focus on getting on with growing their business.

So Jacinda, what do you say? How about an early Christmas present for business?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand