The New Zealand Herald

Inland Revenue still mulling over how to tax bitcoin

- Ian Fay Ian Fay is a tax partner at Deloitte New Zealand

So you were mostly nice last year. And you woke up on Christmas morning to find Santa had rewarded you with a bitcoin in your stocking. You want to do the right thing — because you want another reward from Santa this year — so should you worry about tax on your bitcoin?

If you don’t know, you aren’t alone; even Inland Revenue hasn’t yet provided guidance on how the tax rules apply to cryptocurr­encies, although they are working on it.

Bitcoin is experienci­ng explosive growth in value — and hype. This naturally raises questions of how revenue authoritie­s should be taxing cryptocurr­encies generally.

For background, a cryptocurr­ency is a digital “currency” in which encryption techniques are used to regulate the generation of units and verify the transfer of ownership, operating independen­tly of a central bank. When you buy cryptocurr­ency it is held in a “digital wallet”, and can then be used to buy goods or services from anyone willing to accept it. You won’t actually find a bitcoin in your Christmas stocking, since they’re all just lines of code).

In terms of legal status, the Financial Markets Authority considers cryptocurr­encies are not legal tender (and this is the same around the world). Rather, most cryptocurr­encies are intrinsic tokens (ie, they are not pegged to a dollar or paying any sort of dividend).

The correct tax treatment will depend on the characteri­stics of the currency. The most likely is that it would be treated as property, which means any gains could be taxable on sale — again, this isn’t certain, as the rules on property sales depend on the reason the property was acquired. If the IRD takes the view intrinsic token type cryptocurr­encies are property, it is likely to treat it in the same way as gold bullion — ie, in almost all cases your bitcoin will be acquired for the purpose of cashing it in at some future time. The holder of a cryptocurr­ency would have to demonstrat­e it wasn’t held for sale to convince the IRD of any other outcome — for example, if it provides an income stream during the period of ownership (like the dividend on a share). The alternativ­e way of taxing cryptocurr­ency would be to treat it as a financial arrangemen­t, akin to currency, which, depending on the value of the cryptocurr­ency held, could mean unrealised gains are taxable. Other nations are also grappling with how to tax cryptocurr­encies. In the US, the IRS has released guidance that cryptocurr­ency is property when held on capital account, and gains are subject to capital gains tax. Miners of currency should pay tax on the value of the currency they receive. Britain and Australia also tax gains from the sale of cryptocurr­encies under their capital gains tax rules.

In terms of GST, buying cryptocurr­encies and then using them to buy other goods and services could result in double tax. The purchase of the unit of cryptocurr­ency would be subject to GST, and then any subsequent purchase with the cryptocurr­ency would also be subject to GST.

Deeming cryptocurr­encies to be currency for GST purposes would remove GST from the sale or purchase of any units, solving the double tax problem. Australia will treat them like a currency for GST purposes from July for this reason.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand