The New Zealand Herald

Bungle forces radical op for young mum

- Nikki Preston

Amidwife whose failure in care led to a young mother’s hysterecto­my has been told to apologise. Deputy Health and Disability Commission­er Rose Wall has found the midwife was in breach of the code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights for the care she provided to the woman in labour by not giving her enough informatio­n about the possible risks and options of transferri­ng to hospital earlier.

Wall found the 20-year-old’s lead midwife and a duty midwife at the birthing centre both failed to communicat­e the risks her slow labour could pose to her and her baby.

The woman ended up having an emergency caesarean section and a hysterecto­my after doctors were unable to control the bleeding from a post-partum haemorrhag­e.

The first-time mother had been labouring at a birthing centre for hours in 2014 when she became distressed. The midwife documented that she had discussed transferri­ng the woman to hospital because of her state and the woman declined.

The woman kept labouring with little progress when the duty midwife was called for a second option.

The duty midwife said she spoke with the woman about transferri­ng to hospital to have a an obstetric appointmen­t, but the conversati­on was not documented. But neither the woman nor her partner could recall at any point being told by either midwife about their concerns about the labour not progressin­g.

The woman’s partner said they were under the impression that there was no need to go to the hospital.

When the woman had been in labour for well over 12 hours and had still made little progress, she was eventually transferre­d to hospital and seen by the obstetric team.

Her baby was delivered via C-section and when she suffered a post-partum haemorrhag­e and did not stop bleeding, a “life-saving hysterecto­my” was performed.

In her findings, Wall criticised the midwife for not recommendi­ng an obstetric consultati­on to the woman due to her slow progress in labour.

Wall found the midwife in breach of the guidelines and said the woman would not have been able to make an informed decision without being presented with all the informatio­n.

Wall also criticised the midwife for not recommendi­ng the woman see an obstetrici­an when her blood pressure was high during pregnancy.

The midwife was ordered to apologise to the woman and was recommende­d to undertake a Special Midwifery Standards Review, and undergo training on the referral guidelines and documentat­ion. Wall also recommende­d the Midwifery Council review her competency.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand