Tensions high despite talk of truce
Clashes between Israel and Hamas a sign of volatility
With a ceasefire declared on Wednesday, Israel and Hamas appear to have pulled back from a fourth war after a day of intense rocket fire and airstrikes. But the situation could explode at any moment.
Tuesday’s fighting was the heaviest since a 2014 war, with Palestinian militants firing scores of rockets and mortars into Israel, and Israel carrying out dozens of airstrikes in Gaza.
Both sides appeared to have accomplished some short-term goals. But the underlying issues that helped fuel the fighting remain in place.
Hamas, weakened by a decadelong blockade of Gaza, remains defiant and in distress. A confident Israel appears unrestrained by the United States or its Middle Eastern neighbours.
Palestinian militants still have an arsenal of rockets and could potentially inflict damage or casualties in Israel, followed by Israeli retaliation.
Here’s a look at the current state of play and potential for escalation.
How did we get here?
Eleven years after seizing control of Gaza from Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Hamas is in trouble.
Gaza’s economy has been battered by an Israeli-Egyptian blockade, imposed to prevent the group from arming. Three wars with Israel have brought widespread destruction, and the Islamic militant group has no close international allies to bail it out.
Frustrated with his inability to regain control of Gaza, Abbas has stepped up economic pressure on Hamas by cutting the electricity supply and reducing the salaries to tens of thousands of former civil servants in Gaza.
Running out of options and rejecting calls to disarm, Hamas has led a series of weekly mass protests along the Israeli border during the past two months to draw attention to Gaza’s poor conditions and pressure Israel to ease the blockade.
Israel has fired live bullets and tear gas to break up the protests and prevent a mass breach of the border fence, killing more than 110 Palestinians, the vast majority unarmed. Some of the Palestinian protesters hurled fire bombs, burned tyres or tried to breach the fence, undermining Hamas’ claims that the protests were entirely peaceful.
Israel says Hamas is responsible for the bloodshed, and accuses the group of using the demonstrations as a cover for attacks.
Still, Israel has come under heavy international criticism for its use of deadly force.
But the protests have not succeeded in easing the blockade.
How did things escalate?
Earlier this week, Israel carried out a pair of deadly strikes on military posts belonging to Hamas and the smaller Islamic Jihad militant group, contending militants had planted explosives and tried to break through the border to carry out an attack. Four militants were killed.
Islamic Jihad retaliated by firing a barrage of mortar fire into southern Israel near the Gaza border. Hamas later fired rockets for the first time since the 2014 war ended with an informal ceasefire.
The cross-border exchange lasted throughout the night. Israel targeted empty Palestinian military training and weapons sites, while the militants avoided use of powerful longer-range rockets capable of striking deeper into Israel. Both were signs that neither side wants to go to war.
What did each side accomplish?
The Palestinian militants, who accuse Israel of violating the terms of the 2014 ceasefire by targeting their military observation posts, believe they sent a powerful reminder that they still possess arsenals capable of disrupting the lives of hundreds of thousands of Israelis on the other side of the border.
“Israel used to initiate the strikes and end them unilaterally and impose new rules,” said Adnan Abu Amer, an independent analyst in Gaza. “This time the resistance took the initiative [and] came out from this round in a superior position.” From Israel’s perspective, the military delivered a measured, but powerful response that made Hamas realise quickly that fighting is not in its interest. Israel did not signal that it is willing to ease the blockade.
Where do we go from here?
While Israel’s military and the Palestinian militant groups flexed their muscles, little was resolved.
Any time Hamas or Islamic Jihad resort to firing rockets, they risk triggering a fierce Israeli response, especially if there are serious casualties on the Israeli side.
Israel’s “Iron Dome” rocket defence system intercepted dozens of incoming projectiles on Tuesday.
But the system is not fail-safe. One mortar shell landed next to an Israeli kindergarten shortly before it opened, and four Israelis were wounded by Palestinian fire.
It was not immediately clear if Islamic Jihad, a much smaller, Iranbacked militant group, acted independently on Tuesday or at least had the tacit blessing of Hamas. At times, Islamic Jihad has pursued objectives that differ from those of Hamas.
Israel, meanwhile, appears to have made progress in defusing long-term threats posed by Hamas. Its air defences have largely mitigated the rocket threat, and its military has made great progress in destroying Hamas’ system of attack tunnels along the border.
The Trump Administration has shielded Israel from critics in Europe and the human rights community who say Israel’s open-fire orders are illegal because they allow deadly force even when soldiers are not in life-threatening situations.
Israel has quietly forged good behind-the-scenes ties with Egypt and Gulf Arab states that have little empathy for Hamas, an offshoot of the regional Muslim Brotherhood movement.
But Israel’s apparent military and diplomatic advantage does not solve the underlying problem of having a volatile, impoverished territory on its doorstep.
Many analysts and members of the international community believe it is only a matter of time before Gaza boils over again as long as the blockade remains in place and the suffering in Gaza continues.
That could happen sooner than later.
Next Tuesday, Hamas plans another mass protest along the border.