The New Zealand Herald

We must get to root of kauri disease

-

The Department of Conservati­on’s classifica­tion of kauri as a threatened species is one more reminder that not nearly enough is being done to investigat­e and stop this disease called dieback. That very name says how little is known about it. The word describes what it does, not what it is. Its biological name, Phytophtho­ra agathidici­da, is not much more help. Phytophtho­ra means “plant destroyer” and agathidici­da means “kauri killer”. Various types of Phytophtho­ra are common in the world but this one is a new type and we know almost nothing about it.

Biologists are reasonably certain it is transmitte­d by soil, not wind or birds, and a lot of soil adheres to human footwear. So walking tracks in infected areas around Auckland have been closed for the time being. But that cannot be the solution. If closing the Waitakere walks proves to contain the spread of the disease it will be good news. But the question would arise, what then? Is bush-walking forever to be banned in the Waitakeres, the infected areas of the Coromandel or Waipoua Forest where the disease has also appeared?

These magnificen­t trees are the crowning glory of our native forests. The ancient specimens in Waipoua have stood for hundreds of years, linking us to millions of years before human beings evolved on the planet, let alone migrated to this distant corner of the Pacific. Kauri ruled the primeval forest when birdcalls were the only sound to be heard and no mammals trod on the trees’ shallow roots. But even if it was possible to lock people out of mainland forests indefinite­ly, it should not be contemplat­ed.

People who love our native forests will respect the rahui so long as they know that scientific research is underway to provide the knowledge that could allow the disease to be managed if not eradicated. The Tree Council complains that too little is being done to discover what kills the microscopi­c organism that causes the deadly mould, where in the ground it is, where in the tree it takes hold and how it can be detected reliably and rapidly.

It is now 10 years since kauri dieback became apparent yet the council says we still do not even know where it came from nor how long it has been in this country. It wants to see the Government put far more effort into a research programme overseen by the biological heritage unit in the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. The council hopes DoC’s classifica­tion of kauri as a threatened species will focus the Government’s mind. This problem is more local, visible and urgent than some of those that attract the Green Party’s energy.

Aerial surveys of the Waitakere Ranges have found the area of kauri dieback more than doubled in the five years to 2016. The Tree Council says dead trees are appearing in Waipoua Forest every month and Trounson Park has become “a kauri graveyard”. At this rate, it estimates, we could lose kauri within 30 years. That must not happen. We owe it to future generation­s to get to the root of this disease and stop it spreading. This newspaper is subject to NZ Media Council procedures. A complaint must first be directed in writing, within one month of publicatio­n, to letters@nzherald.co.nz. If dissatisfi­ed, the complaint may be sent to the Media Council, P O Box 10-879, The Terrace, Wellington 6143. Or use the online complaint form at www.mediacounc­il.org.nz Include copies of the article and all correspond­ence with the publicatio­n.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand