The New Zealand Herald

Landlord loses fight with EU diplomat

Tenancy Tribunal’s decision on $20,000 bill dubbed a travesty

- Isaac Davison

Alandlord who tried to recoup $20,000 in unpaid rent and damages from a European Union diplomat has lost his case. The Tenancy Tribunal ruled EU deputy head of mission Eva Tvarozkova could not be asked to repay the costs to the landlord because she had diplomatic immunity in New Zealand.

Wellington landlord Matthew Ryan called the decision a travesty.

“It gives a really poor message to landlords,” he told Newstalk ZB’s political editor Barry Soper.

“It states very clearly landlords have no rights.

“And it sends a message out to all diplomats that they can behave appallingl­y . . . and there will be no redress for them because the Tenancy Tribunal puts its hands up and says ‘We can’t assist you’.”

Tvarozkova, from Slovakia, was told by the tribunal in April that she had to pay Ryan $20,000 for unpaid rent and damaged property at a $1.5 million Wellington townhouse, which she had rented for $1500 a week.

However, the tribunal did not consider Tvarozkova’s automatic immunity as a diplomat.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and that Eva Tvarozkova is protected from paying a $20,000 bill because of diplomatic immunity.

Trade (Mfat) asked the European Delegation in New Zealand to waive immunity, but it declined.

A rehearing was granted in May, and the tribunal’s ruling was released yesterday.

“The [landlord’s] applicatio­n is dismissed for want of jurisdicti­on,” adjudicato­r Rex Woodhouse said.

In a further blow to the landlord, the tribunal said the $6000 bond could be paid back to Tvarozkova if her lawyers requested it.

“I think the entire decision is a travesty,” Ryan said. It would have ramificati­ons for all diplomats wanting to rent Kiwi properties, he said.

He was hopeful of an out-of-court settlement, which the diplomat’s lawyers had indicated during the hearings was possible.

At the centre of the dispute was whether the lease of the Karaka Bays property could be defined as a commercial transactio­n.

In two recent cases in Canada, judges ruled that immunity did not apply to commercial transactio­ns, including unpaid rent.

However, Woodhouse did not agree with those rulings.

“I am not persuaded that they present a correct interpreta­tion of the law to be accepted as authoritat­ive,” he said.

Tvarozkova, who has been posted in New Zealand since 2014, had a fixed-term lease at the property until September but left the property early.

Ryan successful­ly applied to get back the unpaid rent until the house was tenanted again — a total of $17,357.

The landlord also successful­ly applied for the costs of damage to blinds and an internal lift, and the cost of an alarm callout when the tenant was overseas.

But after Mfat alerted the tribunal to Tvarozkova’s immunity, it agreed a miscarriag­e of justice had occurred.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand