The New Zealand Herald

What I meant to say was . . . Trump apologises, sort of

President backtracks but only so far over intelligen­ce comments

- Zeke Miller and Lisa Mascaro

Blistered by bipartisan condemnati­on of his embrace of a longtime US enemy, President Donald Trump yesterday backed away from his public underminin­g of American intelligen­ce agencies, saying he simply misspoke when he said he saw no reason to believe Russia had interfered in the 2016 US election.

Rebuked as never before by his own party, including a stern pushback from usually reserved Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, the US President sought to end 27 hours of recriminat­ion by delivering a rare admission of error.

“The sentence should have been, I don’t see any reason why I wouldn’t, or why it wouldn’t be Russia,” instead of why it would, Trump said yesterday of the comments he had made on Tuesday while standing alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin on the summit stage in Helsinki.

That didn’t explain why Trump, who had tweeted a half-dozen times and sat for two television interviews since the Putin news conference, waited so long to correct his remarks.

And the scripted cleanup pertained only to the least defensible of his comments.

He didn’t reverse other statements in which he gave clear credence to Putin’s “extremely strong and powerful” denial of Russian involvemen­t, raised doubts about his own intelligen­ce agencies’ conclusion­s and advanced discredite­d conspiracy theories about election meddling.

He also accused past American leaders, rather than Russia’s destabilis­ing actions in the US and around the world, for the souring of relations between the two countries.

And he did not address his other problemati­c statements during a weeklong Europe tour, in which he sent the Nato alliance into emergency session and assailed British Prime Minister Theresa May as she was hosting him for an official visit.

“I accept our intelligen­ce community’s conclusion that Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election took place,” Trump conceded yesterday.

But even then he made a point of adding, “It could be other people also. A lot of people out there. There was no collusion at all.”

Moments earlier, McConnell felt the need to reassure US allies in Europe with whom Trump clashed during his frenzied trip last week, saying: “The European countries are our friends, and the Russians are not.”

Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said Trump was trying to “squirm away” from his comments alongside Putin. “It’s 24 hours too late and in the wrong place,” he said.

Hundreds of activists, led by lawyer Michael Avenatti and actress Alyssa Milano, staged a protest near the White House, with chants of “traitor!”

Trump still maintained that his meetings with Nato allies went well and his summit with Putin “even better”. But this reference to diplomatic success carried an edge, too, since the barrage of criticism and insults he delivered in Brussels and London was hardly well-received.

On Capitol Hill, Republican leaders said they were open to slapping fresh sanctions on Russia, but they showed no sign of acting any time soon.

“Let’s be very clear, just so everybody knows: Russia did meddle with our elections,” said House Speaker Paul Ryan, another steady Trump political ally. “What we intend to do is make sure they don’t get away with it again and also to help our allies.”

In the Senate, McConnell said “there’s a possibilit­y” his chamber would act, pointing to a bipartisan measure from Republican Senator Marco Rubio and Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen to deter future Russian interferen­ce by ordering sanctions against countries if they do.

Both parties called for Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and other officials to appear before Congress to tell exactly what happened during Trump’s two-hour private session with Putin. Pompeo is to publicly testify before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on July 25.

Schumer also urged the Senate to take up legislatio­n to boost security for US elections and to revive a measure

passed earlier by the Judiciary Committee to protect special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigat­ion into Russian election interferen­ce.

But minority Democrats have few tools to enforce anything.

In the House, Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi staged a vote in support of the intelligen­ce committee’s findings that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. But even that largely symbolic measure was blocked by Republican­s.

Senators had floated a similar idea earlier, and Republican Jeff Flake of Arizona said he was preparing a bipartisan bill.

Trump’s meeting with Putin in Helsinki was his first time sharing the internatio­nal stage with a man he has described as an important US competitor — but whom he has also praised as a strong, effective leader.

Standing alongside Putin, Trump steered clear of any confrontat­ion with the Russian, going so far as to question American intelligen­ce and last week’s federal indictment­s that accused 12 Russians of hacking into Democratic email accounts to hurt Hillary Clinton in 2016.

“I have great confidence in my intelligen­ce people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today.

“He just said it’s not Russia. I will say this: I don’t see any reason why it would be,” Trump said. That’s the part he corrected yesterday.

White House officials did not elaborate on how Trump came to issue the clarificat­ion, but Administra­tion aides described being stunned by his initial remarks on Tuesday.

Republican leaders, outraged by Trump’s comments in Helsinki, found out about his attempts to quell the outrage the same way everyone else did, as one aide put it, by watching and learning.

After his walkback, Trump said his Administra­tion would “move aggressive­ly” to repel efforts to interfere in American elections.

“We are doing everything in our power to prevent Russian interferen­ce in 2018,” he said. “And we have a lot of power.”

 ??  ?? Donald Trump tried to explain his controvers­ial comments in Helsinki by saying he “misspoke”.
Donald Trump tried to explain his controvers­ial comments in Helsinki by saying he “misspoke”.
 ?? Photo / AP ??
Photo / AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand