How US agency secretly tracked air travellers
Nine years after hijacked planes destroyed the World Trade Centre and crashed into the Pentagon, undercover police officers in the United States quietly began scrutinising the behaviour of people in airports and on planes.
Using recently developed technology to track travel patterns and classic gumshoe observation, they took things one step further than the familiar uniformed Transportation Security Administration agents at airport checkpoints.
Called “Quiet Skies”, the programme, which reportedly uses an unknown algorithm to flag flyers without any criminal record for surveillance on domestic flights, originated in 2010 under then-TSA Administrator John Pistole. A former FBI deputy director, he changed the TSA from an agency that simply screened travellers at checkpoints into one that made greater use of information gathered by intelligence sources to identify possible terrorists.
“We looked at whether we could use our existing resources in a more effective, efficient way,” Pistole recalled yesterday. “Really, we were looking at how can we buy down risk, mitigate those risks, through common-sense application of our resources.”
He pointed to the hijackers who commandeered four commercial planes on September 11, 2001, to illustrate the type of travel patterns that might draw the TSA’s attention.
“The 19 hijackers on 9/11 did some pre-operational flights to assess security,” Pistole said.
He said the agency utilised the FBI’s terrorist screening database to single out those people who still were permitted to fly. It also stationed plainclothes personnel in airport terminals and as in-flight air marshals to observe passengers.
“For the unknowns it was just based on their behaviour, their activity,” he said. “Shame on us if we’re doing preoperation surveillance on the flight, but they weren’t on anybody’s radar.”
Pistole said he consulted with legal counsel at the TSA and the Department of Homeland Security before launching the programme. Congress was unaware of Quiet Skies until reports surfaced over the weekend in a story broken by the Boston Globe and confirmed by the Washington Post.
“It’s one thing to provide additional security screening at the checkpoint, but shouldn’t we be able to do something more during the flight, just to make sure that we’re buying down risk the best way we can?” Pistole said. “We were trying to be forward-leaning and a little more predictive in what the threats might be.”
The TSA screens more than two million passengers daily at 440 airports, employing a security force of 43,000 people.
Several members of Congress said yesterday that they were seeking more information on Quiet Skies.
Frederick Hill, spokesman for the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, which has jurisdiction over the TSA, said that committee also has requested additional information on the programme.
TSA undercover agents are trained to observe passengers waiting to board flights and those already on the plane, using a lengthy checklist of behaviours that, officials say collectively, suggest the person might be a terrorist.
“It’s a programme where we identify people who have irregular travel patterns or exhibit behaviours that we know known terrorists have exhibited, so they come up as someone who is worth additional attention,” TSA spokesman Jim Gregory said. “It’s no different than how a police precinct might put additional police presence on a beat just to make sure that if anything happens there’s someone close by who can address it.”
Pistole said he did not know whether anyone had been taken into custody as a result of Quiet Skies.
It’s one thing to provide additional security screening at the checkpoint, but shouldn’t we be able to do something more during the flight, just to make sure that we’re buying down risk the best way we can? John Pistole