The New Zealand Herald

Outbursts stain Serena’s legacy

- Michael Burgess

With her actions during and after the US Open tennis final, Serena Williams damaged her legacy in a significan­t way. She’ll always be seen as a great tennis player, but may not now be regarded as the greatest.

Over the last few years there has been an increasing­ly loud claim that Williams is not just the best female tennis player of all time, but the best player in history across the sexes.

Some pundits have even put up Serena as a contender for one of the best athletes in history, given her dominance of the courts over nearly two decades.

But now, probably not a chance. Williams (23 majors) has been a wonderful player, and may even capture two more grand slams before she retires, which would take her ahead of Margaret Court (24).

But for many tennis aficionado­s, she’ll never be held in the same regard as Court, Steffi Graf (22) or Chris Evert (18).

There’s much more to being a great than lifting the trophy, and Williams has now failed that test several times.

As for ranking her ahead of Roger Federer, Rafa Nadal or Rod Laver? That would be a stretch.

All of those players were great statesman of the sport, generally respectful of the traditions, the fans, the game and their opponents.

Williams’ behaviour in New York last Sunday was inexcusabl­e.

It’s understand­able to lose your cool in the heat of the moment, but the fact she carried on way, way beyond the reasonable, then continued with a curious agenda in the press conference, wasn’t becoming of a such a champion.

Williams appeared to do everything possible to deflect attention from Naomi Osaka’s victory, despite the fact she was outplayed by the Japanese.

It has continued a pattern of behaviour by Williams, especially in a losing situation. Remember 2009 at the US Open? Williams was down 4-6, 4-5, 15-30 against Kim Clijsters when the line judge Shino Tsurubuchi called a foot fault on her second serve.

It was an unusual call, but prompted an incredible reaction.

She stormed over to the line judge, and among other threats said, “I’m going to take this ball and shove it down your [expletive] throat”.

Williams refused to apologise after the match, saying she didn’t think it was necessary.

In 2011, again in New York, Williams lost the plot after a hindrance call from the umpire in the final against Sam Stosur, when she was down a set and a break.

“Are you the one who screwed me over last time?,” she asked Eva Asderaki, launching into a tirade. “If you ever see me walking down the hall, look the other way because you’re out of control, you’re out of control. You’re a hater and you’re just unattracti­ve inside. You get a code violation because I express who I am. We’re in America last I checked. Really, don’t even look at me. I promise you don’t look at me because I am not — don’t look my way.”

Last year in Auckland we got a small taste of the other side of Serena.

Her conduct after a shock second round defeat was regrettabl­e.

In just her second — and final — interview at the tournament Williams spent most of the three minutes and 30 seconds attacking the credibilit­y of the event.

That may not have been her intention, but when someone with the American’s standing says that the blustery afternoon in Auckland was “the least favourite conditions I’ve ever played in”, it felt like a dagger blow to its reputation.

Williams said the ASB Classic “was not a great opportunit­y to assess your game”, a comment that can reverberat­e around the locker room.

There’s much more to being a great than lifting the trophy, and Williams has now failed that test several times.

 ?? Photo / AP ?? Serena Williams rants at referee Brian Earley during her bad-tempered women’s singles final loss at the US Open last weekend.
Photo / AP Serena Williams rants at referee Brian Earley during her bad-tempered women’s singles final loss at the US Open last weekend.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand