The New Zealand Herald

Report: More than two hours’ screen time bad for kids

-

Laura Donnelly

Children who spend more than two hours a day looking at a screen have worse memory, language skills and attention span, a landmark study has found.

The research, which involved children aged between eight and 11 found that those with higher amounts of recreation­al screen time on smart phones and playing video games had far worse cognitive skills across a range of functions.

The research, published by the Lancet Child and Adolescent Health, tracked the daily habits of 4500 children who were then asked to carry out detailed cognition tests.

The study found that more than two hours a day of recreation­al screen time was associated with worse working memory, processing speed, attention levels, language skills and executive function.

The study of US children, led by the University of Ottawa, questioned thousands of parents and children on their daily habits — including time spent sleeping, using smartphone­s and other devices, and levels of physical activity.

Overall cognition skills were best among the one in 20 children who got between nine to 11 hours sleep, less than two hours recreation­al screen time, and at least an hour’s exercise daily.

These children did around 5 per ● British guidelines, set out by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence, recommend no more than two hours’ leisure screen time a day for children of any age.

● In the United States, it is recommende­d that children under 2 have no screen time at all and no more than two hours a day for children over 2.

● In France, it is illegal to market TV shows specifical­ly to children under 3.

● In Taiwan, parents are legally obliged to monitor children’s screen time. They are fined T$40,000 ($1965) if they are found to be letting an under-18 have a screen for hours at a time.

cent better in the tests than the average child. The study isolated screen time as the likely key factor. Children who were glued to their screens for less than two hours per day saw performanc­e around 4 per cent better than the average among their group, regardless of other habits.

Lead researcher Dr Jeremy Walsh said: “These are landmark findings. We’ve set a clear two-hour benchmark here and it shows clear cognitive benefit is associated with keeping within that limit.

“I think parents should now be looking closely at screen time and this suggests it should be limited to two hours a day.”

The findings are from an observatio­nal study, meaning it was not possible to prove that extra time on devices caused the weaker cognitive

skills. But experts believe several factors — the impact of blue light on the brain, the online activity itself and the fact time spent on gadgets eats into time which might otherwise be spent exercising, sleeping or taking part in more social or mentally challengin­g tasks — could explain the links.

Until now, experts have argued about a lack of clear evidence about the impact of screen time.

Walsh said more research was needed to examine the potential impact of different online activities.

In the meantime he urged parents and health officials to consider two hours recreation­al time online as the maximum daily limit.

“We found that more than two hours of recreation­al screen time in children was associated with poorer cognitive developmen­t. More research into the links between screen time and cognition is now needed, including studying the effect of different types of screen time, whether content is educationa­l or entertainm­ent, and whether it requires focus or involves multitaski­ng.

“Based on our findings, paediatric­ians, parents, educators, and policymake­rs should promote limiting recreation­al screen time and prioritisi­ng healthy sleep routines throughout childhood and adolescenc­e,” he said.

Dr Eduardo Esteban Bustamante, from the University of Illinois, said the findings suggest that too much screen time could mean children’s brains had too little time to recover from the strain of each day.

“Each minute spent on screens necessaril­y displaces a minute from sleep or cognitivel­y challengin­g activities. In the case of evening screen use, this displaceme­nt may also be compounded by impairment of sleep quality,” he said.

The study found that children in the United States spend an average of 3.6 hours a day engaged in recreation­al screen time. The research controlled for household income, parental and child education, ethnicity, pubertal developmen­t, body mass index and whether the child had had a traumatic brain injury.

In the study, families were given questionna­ires to see how many children aged 8 to 11 get nine to 11 hours sleep, less than two hours’ recreation­al screen time, and at least an hour’s exercise daily.

The study found 29 per cent of children achieved none of the three recommenda­tions, while 41 per cent met just one, 25 per cent met two and just 5 per cent met all three.

Just over half of the children met the sleep recommenda­tion, while around one third met the screen time recommenda­tion, and 18 per cent met the physical activity recommenda­tion.

While achieving all three was associated with the best performanc­e in the tests, when individual factors were examined levels of physical activity made little difference, with the strongest associatio­n linked to screen time.

 ??  ?? The study found that children with higher amounts of recreation­al screen time had far worse cognitive skills across a range of functions.
The study found that children with higher amounts of recreation­al screen time had far worse cognitive skills across a range of functions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand