The New Zealand Herald

City finally seeing the light on rail

Auckland has the chance to invest in a sustainabl­e rapid transport network it should have built years ago

- Phil Twyford comment Phil Twyford is the Minister for Housing and Urban Developmen­t and Minister of Transport.

Last week a Herald editorial asked whether a heavy rail spur from Puhinui to the airport would be a better option for Auckland than the planned light rail network. It’s a fair question, and one that the experts considered closely before deciding light rail was the best option.

We need proper public transport to the airport, and between the two fastestgro­wing job centres in Auckland — the Mangere business precinct and the CBD. We also need transport capacity to support the increasing population­s of suburbs throughout the city. In particular, our redevelopm­ent of state-house land will mean thousands more affordable KiwiBuild homes in Mangere and Mt Roskill. We need to enable our people to move from home to work, to school, and everywhere else they need to go, without ever-worsening congestion.

Only a light rail network, including light rail from the airport and Mangere to the CBD, can achieve all these goals, according to the experts at Auckland Transport (AT) and independen­t transport economists.

Light rail can carry large numbers of people, rapidly, through existing roads. That enables growth and more mediumdens­ity housing. Each light rail line will have the capacity of a four-lane motorway without needing the huge amount of land a motorway requires.

So, when we say we're going to build two-way light rail routes from the city centre to Mangere, to West Auckland, to the North Shore, and, possibly, across South Auckland, we're talking about adding capacity on the scale of a new motorway network at a fraction of the price — all of it inter-connected with the existing heavy rail and bus networks. Light rail in dedicated lanes, separated from road traffic and synchronis­ed traffic lights, is as fast as commuter rail.

What about heavy rail? A glance at a map tells you Puhinui is the closest existing rail station to the airport. But a heavy rail spur from the airport, connecting to the existing network at Puhinui, would be surprising­ly expensive, costing at least $1.5 billion, and it wouldn’t increase the overall transport network capacity.

Instead, it would mean trying to send more trains into the CBD on the southern line, which is already near capacity.

A heavy rail spur also wouldn’t deliver any of the benefits light rail will bring to the communitie­s it will run through. More than 90 per cent of forecast trips on the Mangere-to-CBD light rail line will be Aucklander­s moving to jobs in the city or near the airport, or to schools and other activities. A heavy rail spur, on the other hand, is only really useful to airport users going to and from the CBD.

The experience overseas is that light or heavy rail lines that solely service airport travellers don’t get enough passengers to justify their cost. To stack up economical­ly, they also have to be useful to people moving around their city. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t look to connect Puhinui to the airport.

One of the first tasks I gave to NZTA was to work on rapid public transport from Puhinui station to the airport. It will be a bus service to begin with. In the future, it will become part of a rapid-transit route connecting to Manukau and Botany with a dedicated busway or possibly light rail. This will increase capacity and create growth opportunit­ies along that corridor, which a heavy rail spur would not.

Light rail is a game-changer for Auckland. It is not just about connecting the airport to the CBD. It is about building a network across the city that can carry as many people as a motorway, while taking up far less land and using electricit­y, not fossil fuels.

The question isn't whether light rail is the answer. Nearly every expert agrees it is, including Auckland Transport, the New Zealand Transport Agency, Auckland Council, the Chamber of Commerce, and the independen­t experts. The question is why we didn’t start work years ago, as other cities around the world did.

A world-class city needs a world-class, environmen­tally friendly transport network. My vision is for Auckland to be an even better place to live — a truly worldclass city in the 21st century. To achieve that, the transport investment­s we make have to stack up, and the experts say light rail is the best value for money option for Auckland.

 ??  ?? Light rail is about a network that can carry as many people as a motorway, while taking up far less land and not using fossil fuels.
Light rail is about a network that can carry as many people as a motorway, while taking up far less land and not using fossil fuels.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand