The New Zealand Herald

Ihumãtao has been mishandled

-

When Manukau City Council recognised how significan­t Ihuma¯ tao is to Ma¯ ori, it imposed several “planning instrument­s” which effectivel­y “locked up” the land and prevented its use for urban developmen­t.

These included a Notice of Requiremen­t, so the land could be included in the Otuataua Stonefield­s Reserve as public open space.

The result was the landowners could only get a very low price for their properties, the only possible buyer would be the council as no one else could do anything with the land.

All land should have an intrinsic value based on its natural features and amenities, no matter what side of the road it is on, and the land on the other side of the road was able to be developed, so essentiall­y all the land should have a similar value.

The council was imposing unreasonab­le limitation­s on the property owners and the Environmen­t Court decision recognised this. If the council had offered the landowners a fair market price, willing buyer/willing seller, this situation would never have escalated the way it has.

If the council had not mishandled this so badly, the land would be part of the Stonefield­s Reserve as public open space, no protests, and the ratepayer would not be having to find considerab­ly more money to right the wrong of 150 years ago.

Dudley Barton, Ma¯ ngere.

Obliterati­on

What an excellent article by Prue Kapua about the role of the 2012 Environmen­t Court decision which set aside the original designatio­n of Ihuma¯ tao as open space, leading to Auckland Council fast-tracking plans for urban developmen­t.

Conservati­on, heritage and taonga are the big casualties in recent years under the RMA, Unitary Plan and Auckland Council. A 400-year-old healthy kauri will be removed in Titirangi as the plan does not consider the area a “significan­t ecological area”. Watercare is building an industrial complex the size of a Westfield mall in the small forested community of Woodlands Park and removing healthy kauri and other natives. This in a community protected by the Waita¯ kere Ranges Heritage Act which recognises the area’s unique conservati­on value.

My European visitors are amazed by these types of decisions that obliterate our heritage, as are many New Zealanders.

J Vink, Titirangi.

Understand­ing

I’m an immigrant, a Kiwi Muslim and I am appalled by the comments from this Wellington constituen­t (Herald, August 14).

I’d like to know what the constituen­t means by “people who will change our communitie­s and refuse to follow NZ law/ customs”.

As a New Zealander and practising Muslim, do I want Shariah to rule New Zealand? No. The Qur’an clearly says “there is no compulsion in religion”. Furthermor­e, Shariah obliges Muslims to be loyal to their nation of residence. Therefore, Kiwi Muslims must adhere to New Zealand law as the supreme law of the land.

Christchur­ch was only one tragedy on a long list of acts of white supremacis­t terrorism in the West. White supremacy terrorism remains a far greater threat to New Zealand values and customs than any immigrant or religious group.

This is a time where we all need to stand united. We ask you to recognise that there is a need to root out white supremacy extremism. It’s not enough to simply not be racist; you must be antiracist.

Our job isn’t to sit in mosques and be shot. Rather, our job is to be patriotic citizens and valuable contributo­rs to New Zealand society. And this can only be achieved through understand­ing and collaborat­ion.

Mohamed Anas Raheem, Ahmadiyya

Muslim Jama’at New Zealand

Chief executives

Fran O’Sullivan’s article on CEOs (Herald, August 15) got me thinking about a suggestion I heard some years ago, namely that applicants for CEO positions should be required to tender for their salaries.

This would allow boards to consider skills, experience and cost as a total package and appoint the “best” candidate according to a combinatio­n of all three.

For example, a keen candidate may be willing to accept a lower salary package on appointmen­t in order to demonstrat­e his or her potential, allowing future payments to be awarded on a performanc­e basis. It would also allow the perceived wisdom that “you have to pay top salaries to attract top people” to be properly tested.

Howard Edwards, Coatesvill­e.

Game or sport?

Video game competitio­ns should not be considered sports. They should be called E Games. Sport is “an activity involving physical exertion”. If we want to continue New Zealand’s proud tradition of high achievemen­t in both Olympics and Commonweal­th Games we need our young people to play sport. This is activity that involves running, jumping or throwing. Not sitting on a chair twiddling a few knobs. Oh, and by the way, I don’t consider darts to be a sport either. It is a game like pool or Monopoly.

Glen Stanton, Mairangi Bay.

Beyond 1984

Brian Rudman (Herald, August 14) is correct, it is appalling that the installati­on of all these cameras and all this technology to support them and (let’s be honest) facial recognitio­n in the next breath, could possibly happen without any political decision and without any chance for the public to take part in the debate.

In more senses than one, we are beyond 1984. This is yet another example of people in positions of power disregardi­ng the sanctity of human individual­ity.

It is time to take a leaf out of Hong Kong’s book and protest at the threatened loss of our freedom.

Peter Newfield, Takapuna.

Coroner’s report

It is disturbing to read of the letter, coauthored by Dr Johnston (Herald, August 14), in which the Coroner’s report on the death of Sapphire Williams is questioned — on the grounds of scientific accuracy. Is it perhaps to condone alcohol consumptio­n when pregnant, particular­ly of the amount mentioned?

Rather more importantl­y, pregnancy and alcohol do not mix and should never be encouraged. This is not being PC but simply sensible.

Premature infant and neo-natal deaths are too high now, as is the incidence of foetal-alcohol syndrome.

Dr Williams and her colleagues have not done obstetrics any service.

Dr Bryan Frost, Morrinsvil­le.

E scooters

The latest generation of rental e-scooters appearing in Auckland are largely dark coloured, making them difficult to see and a danger in poor light conditions.

When parked, they often blow/fall over, their protruding handlebars worsening the collision hazard for passersby.

It should be compulsory for rental bikes and scooters to have mostly reflective colours, especially at their extremitie­s, such as handlebars.

Matt McLean, Grey Lynn.

Breaking contracts

We have telephone and door-to-door salespeopl­e establishi­ng contracts for phone, electricit­y and other key services by cold calling people at home.

These are, in essence, verbal contracts and the discussion forms the basis of an individual’s understand­ing but is very difficult to prove later if things go wrong or a person wants to cancel.

In my view, where a contract is establishe­d by phone or door-to-door and the organisati­on provides services based on a monthly cycle, the notice period for exiting the contract should be no longer than one month without penalty.

I also believe that if banks can alter their interest rates in mortgage contracts by giving a period of notice, then the customer should also be allowed the same period to cancel their contract if required, without penalty.

Bill Cromwell, Welcome Bay.

Dump fees

Carrying a full load of broken fencing and hedge clippings from the bach at Whangapoua on a large double-axle trailer last Thursday, we decided to give the Thames tip a go. Imagine our surprise when the attendant said “that will be $15”.

As an example of the Thames Council’s enterprise, unwanted but still usable goods were sold (recycled) in a warehouse on the same grounds.

Something has to be rotten in the state of Denmark for Auckland Council to charge $120. Gary Hollis, Mellons Bay.

 ??  ?? Continue the conversati­on ... 9am-noon
Continue the conversati­on ... 9am-noon

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand