The New Zealand Herald

SFO urged to reopen Murray probe

- Natalie Akoorie

Former Labour MP Sue Moroney has called on the Serious Fraud Office to reopen its investigat­ion into the spending of Dr Nigel Murray in light of an Auditor-General’s inquiry into the purchase of an online doctor app.

The ex-Waikato District Health Board chief executive, with former board chairman Bob Simcock, has been criticised over the flawed procuremen­t of HealthTap in 2015, in a report released yesterday by the Auditor-General.

It comes as Simcock told the Herald he was relaxed about his role in the saga, which cost taxpayers $26 million.

Moroney said the AuditorGen­eral’s report raised more questions than it answered.

The SmartHealt­h virtual care app was an abysmal failure and was eventually canned by a new board after the project failed to reach targets by the end of a two-year contract.

“The rules and procedures ignored by Waikato DHB in its expensive virtual health experiment are there to protect taxpayers,” Moroney said.

“Those procedures weren’t followed and we still don’t know why the decisions were made in haste without due diligence or other providers being considered.

“Given what we know about Nigel Murray’s history of unauthoris­ed spending, the Serious Fraud Office needs to reopen its investigat­ion.”

Driven by Murray and Simcock, who both later quit amid Murray’s expenses scandal, the procuremen­t “fell well below the standards expected of a public entity”, the inquiry said.

Fundamenta­l aspects of good procuremen­t were missing, defective, or carried out too late in the process to be effective. These included:

● No formal planning before HealthTap was approached — which meant no business case and risk analysis, no identifica­tion of stakeholde­rs and no evaluation of other options in the market.

● The DHB’s legal and procuremen­t teams were not notified of the process and there was no evidence of governance oversight until after a contract was already drafted.

● No evidence that before approachin­g HealthTap any considerat­ion was given to either specific government rules, including whether the DHB was permitted to approach a single provider, or the DHB’s own procuremen­t policy.

Murray could not be reached for comment and his lawyer did not respond to questions.

Simcock said he was “comfortabl­e” with his role in the procuremen­t and denied that it was rushed.

He first visited HealthTap at its Palo Alto base in California in November 2014. Murray went in mid-March and by April they had a draft contract.

The board was presented with the virtual care strategy in mid-June and signed off in mid-July, although it’s understood two board members voted against it.

When asked about the sidesteppi­ng of national rules on procuremen­t, Simcock said he was not in a position to provide an informed response, despite reading a draft copy of the inquiry report some months ago.

Health Minister David Clark said mistakes had been made and it was important lessons were learned.

“Clearly procuremen­t processes were not followed as they should have been and there are lessons there for the wider industry.”

Waikato DHB commission­er Dr Karen Poutasi said the DHB now had a new approval process for capital spending of public money.

Auditor-General John Ryan said the inquiry findings justified initial concerns.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand