The New Zealand Herald

Being Judy Garland

Zellweger's stunning transforma­tion

- Jake Coyle

For Renee Zellweger, the task of becoming Judy Garland was too daunting to contemplat­e all at once. Such a character needed to be assembled piecemeal: a bit-by-bit metamorpho­sis starting with the voice, followed by workshoppi­ng the songs and then building in the mannerisms, the hair, the make-up, the stage presence, and so on.

“It was a series of experiment­s, an exploratio­n that we all shared trying to understand and see what was possible, seeing what we could conjure,” says Zellweger. “It was always in motion.”

The accumulati­on of all those layers, in Rupert Goold’s Judy, can feel like a magic act. There are no signs of the nearly two years of work that went into Zellweger’s Garland, just the dazzlingly detailed final draft.

“I felt like we took hundreds of little steps away from Renee,” says Goold, the British theatre director.

And yet as much as Zellweger’s performanc­e is a whole-bodied acting feat, it’s not mere mimicry. Her Garland may be show-stopping Oscar bait, but it’s also a delicate and deeply felt character study. Its power lies in the fusion between Zellweger and Garland — how they naturally connect despite diverging in drastic ways. Both were American sweetheart­s whose public personas, forged at the heights of fame, cleaved away from them.

“I understand the difference­s between the projection­s that land on a public persona and the truth of the human experience,” says Zellweger. “There are certain things about her experience­s that I understand having lived the life inside Hollywood.”

In Judy, based on Peter Quilter’s stage musical End of the Rainbow, Zellweger, 50, is playing Garland in 1968, at 46, just months before she died of an accidental overdose. Garland, having exhausted all her other opportunit­ies, is performing — sometimes gloriously, often shambolica­lly — a five-week run of shows at the London cabaret Talk of the Town. Plagued by health and financial woes, she’s been chewed and spit out by the Hollywood machine that made her the star of The Wizard of Oz and A Star Is Born.

She’s also haunted by flashbacks with MGM chief Louis B. Mayer, who turned her into one of the most famous people on the planet but who also fiercely controlled her. The executive is depicted as being responsibl­e for her addiction to diet pills, preying on her insecuriti­es (he called her “my little hunchback”) and, according to an unpublishe­d memoir by Garland, regularly groped her.

Judy is about an indomitabl­e performer whose deepest traumas have come from the very thing she loves. It has obvious parallels to the current #MeToo era of Hollywood. Zellweger, herself, was one of Harvey Weinstein’s most consistent stars. He was partly or significan­tly behind Zellweger’s three Oscar-nominated roles (Bridget Jones’s Diary, Chicago and Cold Mountain, for which she won).

Zellweger has said her experience­s with the producer never approached the kind of abuse others have detailed. But the Texas native (whose high-profile romances have included Jim Carrey, Jack White, Bradley Cooper and Kenny Chesney, to whom she was briefly married) is well acquainted with the way an onslaught of fame and the cycles of show business can turn destructiv­e.

“She’s delivering to expectatio­ns that can be extraordin­ary for a sustained period of time. I know what it’s like to do that for a limited period of time,” Zellweger says of Garland. “I can imagine what that must be like — that your identity and your joy and your ability to take care of yourself is wrapped up in constantly delivering something that requires that you not.”

Judy is the apotheosis of a resurgence for Zellweger. Her performanc­e has so bowled over festival audiences that she’s widely considered this year’s front-runner for the best actress Oscar. Speaking at the Toronto Internatio­nal Film Festival this month, Zellweger — effervesce­nt and unguarded, wearing jeans and sneakers — had little to say about that. But making Judy, she said, was “magic”. Since childhood, Garland has existed intertwine­d with own visions of Hollywood. “Her influence is indelible,” she says. “How you dream with her.”

Like her subject, Zellweger has negotiated her own battles with the ups and downs of the film industry. After a string of forgettabl­e films and fatigued from constantly going movie to movie, she took a six-year hiatus from acting beginning in 2010.

“From the inside, there’s been no break. There’s just been working in a different capacity that allowed for other things that a person needs to do when you live once,” Zellweger says. “I needed to do a little growing and learn some different things and have some authentic exchanges to fill the well again.

“It was necessary,” she adds. “I wasn’t healthy. You can’t sleep three hours a night for a sustained period of time and it not have consequenc­e.”

Judy in the end, is no tragedy. It’s a celebratio­n of a resilient icon for whom trouble didn’t melt “like lemon drops”.

“When you understand what led her toward those circumstan­ces, it’s impossible to dismiss it simply as sad. This is a woman who’s heroic,” says Zellweger.

 ?? Photo / AP ?? Renee Zellweger’s transforma­tion into Judy Garland was a bit-by-bit metamorpho­sis.
Photo / AP Renee Zellweger’s transforma­tion into Judy Garland was a bit-by-bit metamorpho­sis.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand