The New Zealand Herald

New law strikes at independen­ce

China to enforce security powers over restive HK

- Chris Buckley and Keith Bradsher

Ayear after protesters in Hong Kong jubilantly defied Chinese rule, the national leader, Xi Jinping, has opened a long-term counteroff­ensive in the territory, signing a sweeping new security law that sets obedience to Beijing above the former British colony’s civil freedoms.

Conceived in secrecy and passed with intimidati­ng speed, the law has ignited uncertaint­y about the future of Hong Kong before any arrests under its sweeping powers to quash political activity and speech that challenge Beijing. Chinese officials and policy advisers have described the security law as part of a “second return” for Hong Kong — one, they suggest, that will scrub away a dangerous residue of Western influence and liberal values.

The law released to the public near midnight lays out new crimes for subverting the Government, seeking to “split” Hong Kong from China, or “colluding” with foreign government­s or “external forces” to spy or gravely harm China — and authorises life imprisonme­nt for the most serious cases.

“Nobody should underestim­ate the determinat­ion of the central authoritie­s to defend national security in Hong Kong,” the main Chinese government office in the territory said in a statement.

In imposing such expansive and drastic legislatio­n, Communist Party leaders in Beijing have faced down the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong. They have also shrugged off opposition from the Trump administra­tion and other government­s, showing Xi’s determinat­ion to remake the territory on his authoritar­ian terms.

Some critics have described the law as a potentiall­y fatal blow to the “one country, two systems” political framework that preserved Hong Kong’s distinctiv­e status, freedoms and laws after China resumed sovereignt­y in 1997. Even before taking effect, the law has created a chill among the once-defiant activists who defined the protest movement.

“Hong Kong people understand this means the end of the ‘one country, two systems’ model for the territory, and we are now reduced to being a city like on the mainland, like Shenzhen or Shanghai,” said Joseph Cheng, a longtime political scientist at City University of Hong Kong. “We will have to behave like the people on the mainland.”

At the least, the new law complicate­s the delicate, oftenconvo­luted game that Hong Kong officials and judges have played since China took back the territory. They have long tried to satisfy Beijing’s demands for loyalty while seeking to assure people in Hong Kong that the territory’s legal system remained insulated from politics, guarding rights absent in mainland China.

That straddling act has become increasing­ly unsteady in recent years as China has applied growing pressure on the territory while protesters in Hong Kong have pressed back, demanding free elections and greater autonomy.

Now the security law — creating a murky realm of police agencies, crimes defined by Beijing and judges picked by Hong Kong’s pro-Beijing leader — is likely to make it harder to preserve the city’s nebulous status as a semi-autonomous enclave under a Communist Party-run superpower.

The law sets out plans to build a complex of agencies and offices in Hong Kong dedicated to enforcing the rules. Those agencies will include an arm of the Chinese national security apparatus that will have the power to collect intelligen­ce in Hong Kong, and handle cases.

“It’s the most fundamenta­l change since the handover,” said Danny Gittings, an expert on Hong Kong’s legal status. Hong Kong officials have said that only a small number of people would be targeted by the rules, and the territory is likely to preserve some room for criticism of the Communist Party of the kind forbidden inside mainland China. “The law will not affect Hong Kong’s renowned judicial independen­ce,” Carrie Lam, the chief executive of Hong Kong, who serves with Beijing’s blessing, said in a video speech to the United Nations Human Rights Council yesterday. “It will not affect legitimate rights and freedoms of individual­s.”

Still, the law may bite faster and sharper than some expect, including in education, where the party has warned against Western influence and dissenting ideas that challenge official Chinese values. Hong Kong politician­s loyal to Beijing and Chinese policy advisers have called for the rules to be enforced swiftly and vigorously, extinguish­ing any possible recurrence of the protests that hit Hong Kong last year.

The law, which was approved unanimousl­y by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, an elite arm of the party-controlled legislatur­e, went into force an hour before the 23rd anniversar­y of Hong Kong’s handover to China. The July 1 anniversar­y has usually been a day for street protests in Hong Kong, which have been muted for months.

 ?? Carrie Lam ??
Carrie Lam

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand