The New Zealand Herald

PM steps back from Twitter row

Attorney-General’s repudiatio­n of fraud claims a ‘betrayal’

- Derek Cheng

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern is stepping back from the ongoing China-Australia feud, saying New Zealand has not taken sides.

On Tuesday she said New Zealand had raised concerns with China over its use of a doctored image on Twitter, but yesterday she said the same thing would have happened if Australia had done it.

“We’ve made the point we’ve wanted to make and we’ll be leaving it at that.”

The doctored image, posted by an official Chinese Government account, shows an Australian soldier holding a bloodied knife to a Afghan child’s throat — a reference to the alleged unlawful killings by Australian soldiers in Afghanista­n.

Her comments follow criticism that New Zealand was bleating like an Australian sheep in the Global Times, a daily newspaper considered to be a mouthpiece for the Chinese Communist Party.

And China’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoma­n Hua Chunying said she was “very surprised” that New Zealand had raised concerns.

“Does this matter have anything to do with New Zealand? We have pictures and other facts including the Australian Defence Department’s report on this matter. The truth and the merits of this matter are crystal clear.”

Ardern said she didn’t believe raising concerns had hurt China-NZ relations.

“This mature relationsh­ip we have with China, they expect New Zealand to raise concerns when we see them.”

Nor was raising concerns a sign that New Zealand was siding with Australia.

“We certainly don’t see it that way. If we saw a visual representa­tion published by Australia that was incorrect, a doctored image for instance, we would raise concern also.

“It was a matter of principle.” Asked if she would condemn the Australian war crimes, she said: “We’re already seeing Australia taking action on that and responding to it.”

Attorney-General William Barr acknowledg­ed yesterday that the Justice Department has uncovered no voting fraud “on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election”, a striking repudiatio­n of President Donald Trump’s groundless claims that he was defrauded.

The statement from Barr affirming Joe Biden’s win served as a particular­ly harsh blow to Trump’s efforts to overturn the results of the election. Barr has advanced Trump’s political agenda perhaps more than any other Cabinet member, bringing the Justice Department as close to the White House as it has been since Watergate.

His comments came as other Republican­s separated themselves from Trump’s charged complaints about the election. A Georgia elections official angrily denounced the violent threats and harassment directed at elections workers and urged the President to “stop inspiring people to commit potential acts of violence”.

“Someone’s going to get hurt,” the official, Gabriel Sterling, said at a news conference.

And Senator Mitch McConnell, the majority leader, moved closer to overtly accepting that Biden would be in the White House next year as he discussed the prospects for more pandemic stimulus in 2021.

“After the first of the year, there is likely to be a discussion about some additional package of some size next year, depending upon what the new administra­tion wants to pursue,” McConnell said on Capitol Hill.

Barr had been mostly silent since the election, but some Republican­s privately pushed him to publicly rebut Trump, according to a person told of those conversati­ons.

His comments may have been prompted by Trump’s increasing­ly specious election claims; the President suggested on Monday that the Justice Department and the FBI may have played a role in an election fraud.

Barr took particular aim at a widely discredite­d conspiracy theory promoted by Trump’s legal team involving machines manufactur­ed by Dominion Voting Systems, a company that sells voting hardware.

“There’s been one assertion that would be systemic fraud, and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentiall­y to skew the election results. And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven’t seen anything to substantia­te that,” Barr said, referring to the Department of Homeland Security and his own department.

Barr’s acknowledg­ment of the election results was an about-face from his posture during the campaign. But he spoke out only after the President spent weeks promoting baseless assertions about the election outcome and long after department lawyers told Barr there was no evidence of substantia­l irregulari­ties.

And even as Barr distanced himself from Trump’s election claims, the Justice Department also announced a move certain to please Trump: Barr has given additional protection­s to John Durham, the federal prosecutor whose examinatio­n of the Russia investigat­ion Trump had embraced.

The move makes it more difficult for the Biden administra­tion to fire Durham without providing evidence of misconduct.

Trump’s allies immediatel­y pushed back on Barr’s election assessment.

Rudy Giuliani claimed his team had gathered evidence of illegal voting in six states, backed up by sworn witness statements, and that the Justice Department had failed to investigat­e what the team had uncovered.

Barr had given prosecutor­s the authority to examine allegation­s by Trump’s allies of voter ineligibil­ity in Nevada and improperly dated mailin ballots in Pennsylvan­ia.

The results of those investigat­ions have not been publicly disclosed, but Barr’s remarks suggest any impropriet­y was too insignific­ant to change the results.

Barr also suggested that lawsuits or audits by election officials served as remedies for suspicions of election irregulari­ties, not criminal inquiries.

“There’s a growing tendency to use the criminal justice system as sort of

a default fix-all, and people don’t like something, they want the Department of Justice to come in and ‘investigat­e,’” Barr said.

Barr has placed himself in a precarious position with Trump, who recently fired Christophe­r Krebs, the senior cybersecur­ity official responsibl­e for securing the presidenti­al election, who prominentl­y disputed Trump’s false claims that the presidency was stolen.

PBS White House correspond­ent Yamiche Alcindor was told by sources the President’s team was furious Barr gave the interview.

“One source tells me Barr’s AP interview is a ‘complete betrayal’ and says Barr has been ‘a total failure’.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? John Durham
John Durham
 ?? Photo / AP ?? Department of Justice lawyers told Barr weeks ago there was no evidence of substantia­l irregulari­ties.
Photo / AP Department of Justice lawyers told Barr weeks ago there was no evidence of substantia­l irregulari­ties.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand