The New Zealand Herald

It took a scandal to make changes

- Derek Cheng

Why is the Ministry of Health so poor at doing what it’s told, and how can this be fixed? This is the crux of the independen­t report by Heather Simpson and Sir Brian Roche, who were brought in to babysit the ministry when the testing at the border wasn’t being done properly.

The report and its recommenda­tions are yet to be released, even though a draft was sent to the Government two and a half months ago. But the issues it seeks to address are not new.

On June 23, Cabinet had said border-facing workers would be regularly tested, but after the August cluster emerged almost two months later, most of them still hadn’t been tested once.

The ministry had its own notes on the testing strategy, saying asymptomat­ic testing at the border wasn’t even viable.

Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins called the yawning chasm between Cabinet and the ministry “frustratin­g” and “disappoint­ing”.

Director general of health Dr Ashley Bloomfield called it “dissonance”.

There is plenty the ministry has got right, and our Covid-free communitie­s are a testament to this.

But it is also not the first time there has been such frustratin­g dissonance.

From June 9, no one was meant to leave managed isolation until they had tested negative, and they were meant to be tested on day 3 and day 12. Then two sisters, who later tested positive, were allowed to leave early on compassion­ate grounds without a test.

It took a further week for the ministry to tell us how many other people — 53, it turned out — had been able to leave MIQ early without a test result, while hundreds of others had completed their 14-day stay but had only been offered a test. You would think these would have been quick and simple answers to very pressing questions in the circumstan­ces.

But the health system has become such a fractured consortium that getting basic informatio­n was apparently next to impossible.

It was the same with contacttra­cing. Running a national pandemic response to an immediate threat was not ideal when the country’s 12 public health units were all essentiall­y blind to each other, all running different informatio­n systems — some even paper-based.

This was a problem the ministry had to overcome in a hurry. And it did, but it took an independen­t review — by now-Cabinet Minister Ayesha Verrall — to push those changes into urgency.

It took the sisters’ road trip and an uproar — from Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, even — for the ministry to implement the pre-departure MIQ test that should have already been in place.

The Simpson-Roche report includes recommenda­tions to harmonise the dissonance, but the report’s release is hardly setting speed records. It landed on Hipkins’ desk at the end of August, but he revealed in early November Bloomfield hadn’t seen it yet.

The ministry also took exception to the findings, and there has been a lot of back and forth for the past two months.

But Simpson and Roche are no pushovers, and it can hardly be said that Simpson is out of her depth; her health system review, in which she described it as a fragmented mess, is now the driver of the Government’s upcoming changes to the DHB system.

The report will be released — hopefully before Christmas — after the Government decides how to respond to its recommenda­tions.

It may not seem important, given our Covid-free status.

The people let out of MIQ without being tested didn’t pass the virus into the community.

Testing at the border might not have minimised the August cluster.

But it could have been a different story.

Getting it right means we don’t have to take those chances.

 ??  ??
 ?? Photo / George Novak ?? Covid-19 testing at Port of Tauranga.
Photo / George Novak Covid-19 testing at Port of Tauranga.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand